Pneumaticity - Judgment Search Results

Pneumatic Vacuum Elevators Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST),

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR M/s.Pneumatic Vacuum Elevators and Lifts India Private Limited Represented by its Director, Mr. K. Noormohamed, Survey 344/2A1, Ward No.1/8, Nellikuppam Road, Nandivaram Guduvancherry,...

Kirloskar Pneumatic Co.Ltd. vs Salish a.K.

Court: Kerala

(WCC 123/2008) ON THE FILE OF EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER (INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL) THRISSUR, DATED 31-01-2017 APPELLANT/1ST OPPOSITE PARTY KIRLOSKAR PNEUMATIC CO.LTD. CROSS 102,1ST FLOOR,ANDREE K.H. ROAD CAPITAL,BANGALORE-7 REP BY G.A CHAUDHARI (DGM HR) BY ADVS. SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL SMT.P.USHAKUMARI

Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(93)ECC418; 2004(165)ELT511(Bom); 2004(2)MhLj412

compressors over 7.5 H.P. for use in refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment and other air compressors for use in pneumatic operations ('said compressors' for short). For manufacture of the said compressors, the Petitioners require variety of 'spring plates'.

Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1999(105)ELT277(Bom)

A.A. Desai, J.1. The petitioner manufactures Drill Rods Penumatic Tools. In view of the Notification No. 164/83 duty was paid from time to time during the period from 1983 to 1985. Subsequently, it was realised that...

Consolidated Pneumatic Tools Co. (India) Limited Vs. President, Associ ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(3)BomCR412; [2001(88)FLR1011]; (2001)ILLJ884Bom

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The Petitioner company has challenged in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, two awards dated September 9, 1996 and May 30, 1998 in reference IDA No. 501 of 1987...

Mecgale Pneumatics Vs. Bhilai Electrical Supply Company Limited and an ...

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: AIR2004Chh5; 2004(1)CTLJ147(Chhatt); 2003(3)MPHT54(CG)

ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, a registered Partnership Firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act under Registration No. NGP/1441/90-91 and engaged in the...

Consolidated Pneumatic Tool Co. (i) Ltd. and Others Vs. Additional Reg ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1986(3)BomCR572; [1989]65CompCas259(Bom)

resides in the United Kingdom and thus they are non- residents. They represent the parent company M/s. Chicago Pneumatic Holdings Limited United Kingdom on the board of directors of the company.3. As per the balance-sheet of the

Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd Vs. National thermal Power Corporation Ltd ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1987Bom308; 1987(2)BomCR405; [1990]69CompCas389(Bom)

liabilities of the bidder or any rights of the owner as required in these specifications and documents.'4. Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd. of Pune ('Kirloskar') carries on the business, inter alia, of manufacture of air-conditioning and refrigeration units,

Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(16)ECC150; 1987(31)ELT874(Bom)

1. The petitioners are the manufacturers of refrigerating and air-conditioning machinery and appliance. Between May, 1979 and November 1980, the petitioners imported various consignments of components parts of refrigeration and air-conditioning compressors. It is the case...

Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1987]64STC420(Bom)

Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. The applicants, who are the assessees, are registered dealers under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The assessees sold a refrigeration compressor under the invoice dated 15th October, 1974. In respect of...