Plead Over - Judgment Search Results
on the Pleadings of the Parties the Learned Trial Court Framed Vs. Har ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-15-2014
there are ventilatORS.door and windows; therefore, the wall in question is not exclusive of the plaintiff. On the pleadings of the parties, the learned trial Court framed the following issues:- 1) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to
Pleadings D' Cunha Vs. Manakke Hengaue
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-08-1972
Reported in: AIR1972Kant269; AIR1972Mys269; (1972)2MysLJ290
and as such the defendant is a cultivating tenant protected from eviction of the land. 6. On these pleadings, the trial Court has framed six issues. The relevant issues are: (1) whether the plaintiff proves that the
“10. It Is True That Inconsistent Pleas Can Be Made in Pleadings Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-21-2013
therein about the execution of registered gift- deed in favour of defendants No.1 to 3. He had also pleaded that Singh Rajpal 2013.08.22 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CR-4866-2010 2
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“i Have Gone Through the Record and Pleading of the Parties. in Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
Judge on 16.2.2011. Relevant portion of the order reads thus :- “I have gone through the record and pleading of the parties. In the Jamabandi for the year 1951-52, the column of ownership describes the land in
as Per the Pleaded Case of the Petitioner Herself She Possesses Vs. St ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
Thereafter, in April, 2006 the petitioner also qualified the Prabhakar Examination from Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra. It has been pleaded that the petitioner had submitted repeated representations to consider her case for promotion as Sanskrit Teacher but since
“The Appointment Is Being Offered to them to Accommodate them Vs. Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
No.5633 of 1993 titled as Balraj Singh, Som Nath and Ashok Kumar Nanda Vs. Punjab State. It was pleaded that none of the Junior Engineer's, belonging to the Civil Cadre, either from the General or Reserve Category,
“as Is Apparent from the Pleadings of the Plaint as Vs. Subhash Chan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-19-2014
relinquished his share in favour of Subhash Chander defendant No.1 and Ravinder Kumar defendant No.2. It was further pleaded that the Will was duly proved and the plaintiff and other heirs relinquished their share voluntarily. Singh Rattan
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free