Play - Judgment Search Results

O.K. Play (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC1023; 2005(98)ECC609; 2005(180)ELT300(SC); JT2005(1)SC648; (2005)2SCC460; [2005] 1 SCR 1086

and clearing the same without payment of duty. The said articles are Activity Desks and Chairs, Fun Fliers, Play Table, Play Pool, Rockers, Slides and Swings.2. The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of toys. On 24th

O.K. Play (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise-ii, New Delh ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC1031; 2005(98)ECC633; 2005(180)ELT291(SC); JT2005(2)SC208; (2005)2SCC555

the period subsequent to 17th November, 1980 when the retrospective operation of the amended provisions has come into play. However, this is subject to the SCNs having been issued in time. It is also worth noting that

Ok Play Auto Pvt. Ltd. Vs.indian Commerce & Industries Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:25. 04.2018 $~J- * % + ARB.P. 637/2016 and I.A. No.4326/2017 OK PLAY AUTO PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Abhinandan Banerjee, Mr. Vipul Kumar and Mr. Akash Chandra Jauhari, Advs. versus

Play Games 24x7 Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

AND ARTICLE21(PROTECTION OF LIFE AND PERSONAL LIBERTY) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.18732/2021: BETWEEN: PLAY GAMES247 PRIVATE LIMITED REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR PRABHU VIJAYKUMAR, HAVING ITS REGISTRED OFFICE AT5H FLOOR, CENTRAL

Play Games 24 X 7 Private Limited vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

T.R.RAVI MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 5TH ASWINA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 7853 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S:1 PLAY GAMES 24 X 7 PRIVATE LIMITED REGD. OFFICE AT 5TH FLOOR, CENTRAL WING (B), TOWER 4, NESCO IT

Play Arena Sports and Adventure Private Limited vs Surya Ray Elixirs P ...

Court: Karnataka

BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 408 OF 2025 BETWEEN:1. PLAY ARENA SPORTS ANDADVENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT

Lets Play Thrissur vs Union of India,

Court: Kerala

JUSTICE P.V.ASHA FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 20TH BHADRA, 1942 WP(C).No.18237 OF 2020(D) PETITIONER: LET'S PLAY THRISSUR, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SREERADH RAMANATHAN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. RAMANATHAN CHERUPARAMBIL, 'CHERUPARAMBIL HOUSE', PALLIPADIROAD, KOTTAPADI

Play Games 24X7 Private Limited vs State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

ON : 29.04.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 03.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR W.P.Nos.6784 of 2025:1. Play Games 24x7 Private LimitedA Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act 1956, Represented By Its Authorized Representative Mr.Sameer Chugh,

Play Games 24x7 Private Limited vs Ramachandran.K

Court: Kerala

OF 2019 IN WP(C). 35535/2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35535/2018(N) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER: PLAY GAMES 24X7 PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 401, 4TH FLOOR, BUILDING NO. 16,WING-B, INTERFACE COMPLEX, OFF

Metro Playing Card Co. Vs. Wazir Chand Kapoor

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1972Delhi248

interim injunction was issued against the appellant on a motion by the respondent.2. The respondent/Plaintiff manufactures and sells playing cards. On 8th February, 1968, the respondent/Plaintiff registered under No. 233581 in Class 16 a trade mark consisting