Plastering - Judgment Search Results
Dubai Plaster Dry MIX LLC Through Its Legal Representative Attorney Su ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-14-2026
COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 6/2023 DUBAI PLASTER DRY MIX LLC THROUGH ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ATTORNEY SURESH .....Decree
JaIn Plaster and Minerals Vs. Regional Director, Employees' State Insu ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-27-2001
Reported in: [2002(94)FLR533]; (2002)IIILLJ141Raj; 2002WLC(Raj)UC389
H.R. Panwar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated November 29, 1994 passed by the Employees' Insurance Court,...
Laxmi Plasters Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Mar-29-2001
Reported in: (2001)73TTJ(Ahd.)171
The present appeal is directed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) dated 17-3-1989, confirming the levy of...
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
NLRB Vs. Plasters' Local
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-06-1971
the Plasterers, they would lose 30%-40% of their work to plastering contractors. [ Footnote 17 ] It is obvious, therefore, that
Plasterers and Cement Masons Vs. Texaco, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1973
PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS v. TEXACO, INC. - 414 U.S. 935
Commercial Tax Officer, Anti Evasion Vs. JaIn Plaster Industries
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-01-2000
Reported in: [2006]143STC48(Raj)
to the other industries. He also claims that he manufactures plaster of paris from the gypsum.3. The assessing officer found it
Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Shri Ram Plaster
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-16-2008
Reported in: (2009)12VatReporter15
Tax Board has held in favour of the respondent-assessee manufacturing plaster of Paris that he was entitled to the benefit of
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Raj Plaster Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-26-1999
Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT429TriDel
impugned order the Collector of Central Excise held that the Plaster of Paris manufactured by the respondents was not classifiable under
United States Vs. Employing Plasterers Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-08-1954
of the Sherman Act by a Chicago trade association of plastering contractors, a local labor union of plasterers, and the union's
M/S. Laxmi Plaster, Barmsar Vs. Jvvnl Jodhpur and Ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
& ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3501/14) 3. M/S. NAV DURGA PLASTER UDHYOG VS. JODHPUR VIDHYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search - 7 days free