Plastering - Judgment Search Results

Dubai Plaster Dry MIX LLC Through Its Legal Representative Attorney Su ...

Court: Delhi

$~O1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 6/2023 DUBAI PLASTER DRY MIX LLC THROUGH ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ATTORNEY SURESH .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Aryan Dev Pandey, Adv.versusSIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE

JaIn Plaster and Minerals Vs. Regional Director, Employees' State Insu ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [2002(94)FLR533]; (2002)IIILLJ141Raj; 2002WLC(Raj)UC389

H.R. Panwar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated November 29, 1994 passed by the Employees' Insurance Court, whereby an application filed by appellant under Section 75 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948...

Laxmi Plasters Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2001)73TTJ(Ahd.)171

The present appeal is directed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) dated 17-3-1989, confirming the levy of penalty amounting to Rs. 23,886 under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealing the...

NLRB Vs. Plasters' Local

Court: US Supreme Court

Plasterers, and that, without collective bargaining contracts with the Plasterers, they would lose 30%-40% of their work to plastering contractors. [ Footnote 17 ] It is obvious, therefore, that both Texas State and Martini had substantial stakes

Plasterers and Cement Masons Vs. Texaco, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS v. TEXACO, INC. - 414 U.S. 935 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS

Commercial Tax Officer, Anti Evasion Vs. JaIn Plaster Industries

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [2006]143STC48(Raj)

the end-product is sold to the fertilisers and to the other industries. He also claims that he manufactures plaster of paris from the gypsum.3. The assessing officer found it to be a mere processing activity not amounting

Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Shri Ram Plaster

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (2009)12VatReporter15

filed against the order dated 16.9.2003 whereby the Tax Board has held in favour of the respondent-assessee manufacturing plaster of Paris that he was entitled to the benefit of Incentive Scheme and State Level Committee was not

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Raj Plaster Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT429TriDel

the Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur.2. In the impugned order the Collector of Central Excise held that the Plaster of Paris manufactured by the respondents was not classifiable under Heading 25.05 of the Central Excise Tariff (in

United States Vs. Employing Plasterers Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

District Court charging a violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act by a Chicago trade association of plastering contractors, a local labor union of plasterers, and the union's president. The complaint alleged a combination and conspiracy

M/S. Laxmi Plaster, Barmsar Vs. Jvvnl Jodhpur and Ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

INDUSTRIES BARMSAR VS. JODHPUR VIDHYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3501/14) 3. M/S. NAV DURGA PLASTER UDHYOG VS. JODHPUR VIDHYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3506/14) 4. M/S. ABHISHEK PLASTER INDUSTRIES