Planned Development - Judgment Search Results
Punjab Urban Planning Development Authority Vs. Pushpa Sagar Kohli
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Jan-17-2001
Nos. 158, 164, 168, 169 to 172, all of 2000 filed by the present appellant i.e. Punjab Urban Planning Development Authority (PUDA) through its Chief Administrator, S.C.O. No. 63-65, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh. The judgment was delivered in
Sansari Lal Vs. Punjab Urban Planning Development Authority
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Jan-10-1997
due in accordance with the allotment letter. 3. The learned Counsel for the complainant has referred to Lucknow Development Authority v.M.K. Gupta, III (1993) CPJ 7 (SC), wherein it has been held that the Government or semi-Government
A. Annie Sheela Rani Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, Planni ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-2017
in the 2nd respondent's Department with effect from 29.04.2013. The Government of Tamil Nadu by G.O.Ms.No.203, Planning and Development (OP) Department, dated 28.11.1990, had created the post of Administrative Officer in the State Planning Commission. The appointment … necessary disciplinary action as per Rules for her false and frivolous petitions to the government maligning the State Planning commission or to take both of the actions; and also challenging the consequential order passed by the 2nd
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free