Plan - Judgment Search Results

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority Vs. Karamjit Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3925 OF2019(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.29160 of 2018) Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority & Anr. …Appellants Versus Karamjit Singh …Respondent INDU MALHOTRA, J.Leave granted. JUDGMENT1 The present Civil

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority and anr. Vs. Daya Sing ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2010SC486; 2009(3)AWC2726(SC); JT2009(8)SC138; 2009(8)SCALE723; (2009)12SCC569

for the parties. All these appeals by special leave have been filed at the instance of Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority (in short 'PUDA') against the Judgments and Orders passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal

Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Ltd. Vs. Ramu Pasi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(2006)ACC56; 2006ACJ521; AIR2006SC678; 2005(3)BLJR2432; [2006(108)FLR535]; [2006(2)JCR33(SC)]; JT2005(10)SC481; (2006)ILLJ683SC; 2006(2)MhLj367; (2006)142PLR748; RLW2006(2

ORDERArijit Pasayat, J.1. These two appeals relate to a claim made by Ramu Pasi (respondent No. 2) under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (in short 'the Act'). Adjudicating the claim made by the said Ramu Pasi...

Town Planning Municipal Council Vs. Rajappa and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)ALLMR(SC)920; 2008(2)ALT47(SC); 2008(1)AWC529(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(2)CHN20; [2008(1)JCR167(SC)]; JT2008(1)SC557; 2008(3)KarLJ82; 2008(1)SCALE320; (2008)2SCC593; 2008AIRSCW1251; 2008(2)KCCR737; 2008(2)AIRKarR428

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court allowing the second appeal filed by the respondent under Section 100 of the Code of...

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority Vs. Bhupinder Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (SCSuppl)2008(4)CHN113; III(2008)CPJ66(SC); [2009(1)JCR38(SC)]; JT2008(8)SC568; (2008)8MLJ255(SC); (2008)153PLR123; 2008(10)SCALE367; 2008AIRSCW6501

(C) No. 7280 of 2002.2. As will appear from the materials on record, in 1989 the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the 'PUDA'), the appellant herein, invited applications from persons who wished

Director, Town Planning Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Bhalchandra Vasantrao ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC2823; 2006(6)BomCR864; [2006(110)FLR1014]; JT2006(6)SC233; (2006)IIILLJ515SC; 2006(7)SCALE6; (2006)5SCC464; 2007(1)SLJ242(SC)

in a very narrow compass.2. The respondent was working as a Peon in the establishment of Director, Town Planning, Akola. An order of termination was passed taking note of several acts of mis- conduct by the respondent.

Punjab Urban Planning and Dev. Authority Vs. Gurmail Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

1. The petitioner (Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority 'PUPDA' for short) allotted Site No. SCF 83 in Mohali in favour of the respondents,

Punjab Urban Planning and Dev. Authority and ors. Vs. Raghu Nath Gupta ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

High Court has taken the view that since there was delay on the part of the Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (for short “PUDA”) in providing the basic amenities like parking, lights, road, water, sewerage etc.

Punjab Urban Planning and Dev. Authority Vs. M/S. Shiv Saraswati Iron ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998IIIAD(SC)359; AIR1998SC2352; JT1998(2)SC587; 1998(2)SCALE451; (1998)4SCC539

ORDERJudgment pronounced by K. Venkataswami, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Heard counsel on both sides.3. The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of the contract in question by returning (delivery) the goods weighing 124.255 Metric Tonnes...

Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. And Anr. Vs.vijay Kumar ...

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.4217/2003 20th March, 2017 Through: None. CENTRAL MINE PLANNING & DESIGN INSTITUTE LTD. AND ANR. ........ Petitioners VIJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: None.