Plaint - Judgment Search Results

The Executive Officer of Sri Ranganathaswami Devasthanam, Sri Rangam A ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)2MLJ280

by persons in management of the trust and therefore the plaintiff respondent has to resort to the remedies provided under the

“The Perusal of Plaint Itself Shows That Plaintiff Has No Vs. the Ha ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... never appointed as such the plaintiff has not alleged in the plaint that he was ever appointed tubewell operator pump driver on regular ..... on the contrary his appointment as tubewell operator according to the plaint itself was on work charge basis thus he was never appointed ..... as pump driver or tubewell operator even thereafter so the whole plaint taken at its face value does not entitle the plaintiff to .....

“no Doubt That the Law for Amendment of Plaint Quite Liberal but at ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... the trial court dismissed the application annexure p2 for amendment of plaint filed by the plaintiff by virtue of impugned order dated 27 ..... the written statement stoutly denied all the allegations contained in the plaint and prayed for dismissal of suit 8 what cannot possibly be ..... the application annexure p2 filed by the plaintiff for amendment of plaint at arvind kumar sharma 2014 03 07 17 08 i attest .....

Mr. Uma Kant Dubey Vs. the Chairperson, Protectiion of Plaint Varietie ...

Court: Delhi

..... mr uma kant dubey through petitioner mr abhishek saket adv versus the chairperson protectiion of plaint varieties and farms rights authority and ors respondents through mr ram niwas adv and w .....

“1. Whether the Plaint Has Been Properly Valued for the Vs. Sarjo an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... property in favour of sarjo the trial court framed the following issues 1 whether the plaint has been properly valued for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction opp2 whether the .....

“as Is Apparent from the Pleadings of the Plaint as Vs. Subhash Chan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... the lower appellate court observed as under as is apparent from the pleadings of the plaint as set out by the appellant plaintiff that the suit was filed for declaration to .....

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey

Court: US Supreme Court

the required filing of the spousal consent form would require plaintiff clinics to change their counseling 889 procedures and force women

Tmt.Pushpa Vs. K.H.Raviendrran and ors.

Court: Chennai

..... survey no 137 of valasarawakkam village and the land described in plaint b schedule comprised in survey no 177 1b of saligramam ..... first step the defendants 1 and 2 effected a partition of plaint a schedule property under a registered partition deed bearing document ..... entitled to a preliminary decree for partition directing division of the plaint a and b schedule properties into three equal shares and .....

Poland Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

poland v arizona 476 u s 147 1986 u s supreme court poland v arizona 476 u s 147 1986...

Plymouth Coal Co. Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

either property all of this is very frankly admitted by plaintiff in error and the criticism upon 10 of the act