Plaint - Judgment Search Results

Sri. Asharudheenmannan Kandy, vs Assistant Director(Plaint Protection ...

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942 WA.No.168 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT...

State of Kerala (Shown as the Government of Kerala in Exhibit P1 Plain ...

Court: Kerala

2 IN O.S.NO.163 OF 2022: 1 STATE OF KERALA (SHOWN AS THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA IN EXHIBIT P1 PLAINT IN OS NO. 163 OF 2022), REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM - 676505 2 THE

Smt. Shivaleela W/O Ganapati Betageri (Shown in the Plaint as Shivalee ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

K.S.HEMALEKHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100598 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:1. SMT. SHIVALEELA W/O. GANAPATI BETAGERI, (SHOWN IN THE PLAINT AS SHIVALEELA D/O. HANAMANTH BHAJANTRI @ SOPADLA) AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC. PVT. SERVICE, R/O. PLOT NO. 21. 7TH

Shri Danish Salim Marfani (Wrongly Shown in the Plaint as Dinesh Mapan ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.103516 OF 2023 (CPC) BETWEEN: SHRI. DANISH SALIM MARFANI, (WRONGLY SHOWN IN THE PLAINT AS DINESH MAPANI) AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, KRISHNA RAJ LAYOUT, SHAREEN RESIDENCY, PLOT NO. 9, BOYCE COMPOUND,

Mr. Uma Kant Dubey Vs. the Chairperson, Protectiion of Plaint Varietie ...

Court: Delhi

CM No.8808/2012 MR. UMA KANT DUBEY Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Abhishek Saket, Adv. versus THE CHAIRPERSON, PROTECTIION OF PLAINT VARIETIES AND FARMS RIGHTS AUTHORITY AND ORS .... Respondents Through Mr. Ram Niwas, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) 4257/2012

“1. Whether the Plaint Has Been Properly Valued for the Vs. Sarjo an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of his property in favour of Sarjo. The trial Court framed the following issues: - “1. Whether the plaint has been properly valued for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction?. OPP2 Whether the property in suit

“no Doubt That the Law for Amendment of Plaint Quite Liberal but at ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and emanating from the record, are that initially, petitioner-plaintiff Manjit Singh son of Jangir Singh (for brevity “the plaintiff”.) has instituted the civil suit (Annexure P1) for a decree of declaration to the effect that he is

“The Perusal of Plaint Itself Shows That Plaintiff Has No Vs. the Ha ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Om Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the respondents. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (Oral).The plaintiff is in second appeal against the judgment and decree of both the Courts below. The plaintiff filed suit

“as Is Apparent from the Pleadings of the Plaint as Vs. Subhash Chan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

reported in the Digest?. Present: Mr.Avtar S. Bhatti, Advocate for the appellants. RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. This is plaintiffs’ second appeal challenging judgments and decrees of the Courts below whereby their suit for declaration to the effect

The Executive Officer of Sri Ranganathaswami Devasthanam, Sri Rangam A ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)2MLJ280

submission to the jurisdiction of the Endowments Department by persons in management of the trust and therefore the plaintiff-respondent has to resort to the remedies provided under the Act. On appeal by the plaintiff, the lower appellate