Pipeline - Judgment Search Results

Ace Pipeline Contracts Private Limited Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporatio ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC1764; 2007(2)ARBLR49(SC); 2007(3)AWC2667(SC); (2008)4CompLJ20(SC); JT2007(5)SC105; 2007(5)MhLj603; (2007)6MLJ346(SC); 2007MPLJ1(SC); 2007(5)SCALE341; (2007)5SCC304

of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was moved by the Ace Pipeline Contracts Private Limited, the appellant herein, for appointing a retired Judge of the Supreme Court of India to

Mideast Pipeline Products Through Proprietor Maninder Singh vs.fernas ...

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 536/2016 MIDEAST PIPELINE PRODUCTS THROUGH PROPRIETOR ........ Petitioner MANINDER SINGH Through Mr.Jayant Mehta, Mr.Sahil Tagotra and Mr.Rahul Kukreja, Advs. versus FERNAS

Dezhou Shengli Pipeline Crossing Engineering India Pvt Ltd. Vs.ministr ...

Court: Delhi

DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 05.2018 + W.P.(C) 6001/2018 and CM APPL. 23378/2018 (stay) DEZHOU SHENGLI PIPELINE CROSSING ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD. Through: Mr.Raman Gandhi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS

Dezhou Shengli Pipeline Crossing Engineering vs.indian Oil Corporation ...

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 10.2019 + W.P.(C) 11230/2019 DEZHOU SHENGLI PIPELINE CROSSING ENGINEERING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Raman Gandhi, Mr.Aditya Mishra & Ms.

Palarivattom Pipeline Residents Council vs the District Collector & Or ...

Court: Kerala

FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 12178 OF 2011 PETITIONERS:1 PALARIVATTOM PIPELINE RESIDENTS COUNCIL REG.NO.ER-347/04, PIPELINE ROAD, PALARIVATTOM,, KOCHI-25, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, JOSHY V.G. 2 JOSE K.PETER, S/O. K.K.PATHROSE

Osd Hrc Pipeline Engineers Pvt Ltd. Rep by Its Assistant General Manag ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)MLJ113

Chennai. The main scope of the company is to pursue design and project management contracts in the petroleum pipeline and pipeline sector in India. According to the petitioner, it is performing various contracts to public sector companies

Pipelines and Process Equipments Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2008)(125)ECC89

1. After examining the records and hearing both sides, we are of the view that the appeal itself requires to be finally disposed of at this stage. Accordingly, after dispensing with predeposit, we take up the...

Chembur Patalganga Pipelines Vs. Jcit, Spl. Rg. 18

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)98ITD143(Mum.)

of Rs. 50,60,433/- Incurred by the Appellant towards acquiring the right to use the lands for laying the pipelines. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in not directing Assessing Officer to allow the depreciation on

Esorfranki Pipelines (Pty) Ltd. and Another Vs. Mopani District Munici ...

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

to fifth respondents pursuant to the award of the tender to the respondents for the construction of a pipeline between the Nandoni dam and the Nsami water treatment works (Nandoni to Giyani Pipe Project; project number LPR018),

Etsi Pipeline Project Vs. Missouri

Court: US Supreme Court

ETSI Pipeline Project v. Missouri - 484 U.S. 495 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court ETSI Pipeline Project v. Missouri, 484 U.S.