Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Pilon - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 09 1979

Pilon Vs. Bordenkircher

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-09-1979

Pilon v. Bordenkircher - 444 U.S. 1 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Pilon v. Bordenkircher, 444 U.S. 1 (1979) Pilon


Jan 27 2016

Suganiya Vs. The Superintendent of Central Prison, Chennai and Another

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-27-2016

the Habeas Corpus Petitions, learned counsel relied upon the judgment of the US Supreme Court in Richard Earl Pilon v. Donald E.Bordenkircher [444 US 1, 62 L Ed 2d 1, 100 S Ct 7]. The law that


Dec 06 2016

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.raj Kumar & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-06-2016

of right acetablulum, fracture on both bones right leg distal (end) and also the fracture of acetabulum with pilon]. of respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 suffered 19% disability in relation to his right lower limb due to the


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 26 2024

Jobin.M.Abraham vs Ajayan.V.T

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-26-2024

sustained :-1. Swelling right ankle2. Multiple abrasions.3. Fracture lower and both knees of right leg at ankle level.4. Pilon fracture.5. Bimalleolar fracture right ankle.6. Undisplaced lateral condyle fracture right knee.Considering the injuries sustained and age of the


Jan 14 2020

Anandhu K.V vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-14-2020

Ext.A2 is the woundcertificate and Ext.A8 is the discharge card. As per the medical records, the appellant sustained pilon fracture of right ankle. He had undergone inpatient treatment from 21.10.2013 to 29.10.2013 and from 01.06.2015 to 06.06.2015,


Dec 19 2012

Geys Vs. Societe Generale, London Branch

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

of 4 January 2008, that the contractual right to terminate under paragraph 8.3 of the Handbook by the PILON (payment in lieu of notice) method was validly exercised and his employment with the Bank was terminated. The


Feb 21 2014

Antal Babos Vs. Her Majesty the Queen

Court: Canada Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-21-2014

Matched in: Advocate Franco Schiro and Xuan Trung Nguyen, for the appellant Antal Babos. Guylaine Tardif, Jean Pierre Pilon and Maxime Wilkins, for the appellant Sergio Piccirilli. Gilles Villeneuve and François Lacasse, for the respondent.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial