Pilon - Judgment Search Results
Pilon Vs. Bordenkircher
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-09-1979
Pilon v. Bordenkircher - 444 U.S. 1 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Pilon v. Bordenkircher, 444 U.S. 1 (1979) Pilon
Suganiya Vs. The Superintendent of Central Prison, Chennai and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2016
the Habeas Corpus Petitions, learned counsel relied upon the judgment of the US Supreme Court in Richard Earl Pilon v. Donald E.Bordenkircher [444 US 1, 62 L Ed 2d 1, 100 S Ct 7]. The law that
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.raj Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
of right acetablulum, fracture on both bones right leg distal (end) and also the fracture of acetabulum with pilon]. of respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 suffered 19% disability in relation to his right lower limb due to the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jobin.M.Abraham vs Ajayan.V.T
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-26-2024
sustained :-1. Swelling right ankle2. Multiple abrasions.3. Fracture lower and both knees of right leg at ankle level.4. Pilon fracture.5. Bimalleolar fracture right ankle.6. Undisplaced lateral condyle fracture right knee.Considering the injuries sustained and age of the
Anandhu K.V vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-14-2020
Ext.A2 is the woundcertificate and Ext.A8 is the discharge card. As per the medical records, the appellant sustained pilon fracture of right ankle. He had undergone inpatient treatment from 21.10.2013 to 29.10.2013 and from 01.06.2015 to 06.06.2015,
Geys Vs. Societe Generale, London Branch
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
of 4 January 2008, that the contractual right to terminate under paragraph 8.3 of the Handbook by the PILON (payment in lieu of notice) method was validly exercised and his employment with the Bank was terminated. The
Antal Babos Vs. Her Majesty the Queen
Court: Canada Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
Matched in: Advocate Franco Schiro and Xuan Trung Nguyen, for the appellant Antal Babos. Guylaine Tardif, Jean Pierre Pilon and Maxime Wilkins, for the appellant Sergio Piccirilli. Gilles Villeneuve and François Lacasse, for the respondent.
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free