Pilled - Judgment Search Results
Venkatesh Pille Vs. Padmavathi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-23-1987
Reported in: ILR1987KAR946; 1987(1)KarLJ110
ORDERMurlidher Rao, J.1. Though this matter is listed for orders to-day, by consent of advocates, it is taken up for final disposal.2. This is a tenant's petition challenging the order dated 19-1-1985, passed by the Additional...
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-ii Vs. Pressure Pilling Co. (I ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-10-1979
Reported in: [1980]126ITR333(Bom); [1979]1TAXMAN406(Bom)
article produced either by physical labour or by mechanical means.' 6. Thus, according to the Judicial Member, pressure pilling was only a construction work undertaken by the assessee-company and the company was not, therefore, manufacturing or producing
Smt.Vijaylaxmi W/O Basavaraj Pille vs Shri.Basavaraj
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: May-31-2024
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MAY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.100018/2020 BETWEEN:1. SMT. VIJAYLAXMI W/O. BASAVARAJ BELLI, AGE: 30...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohammed Zakaulla S/O Late HussaIn Saheb, Prop. Bharath Medicals and S ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-26-2007
Reported in: 2008(3)KarLJ583; 2008(2)AIRKarR124; AIR2008NOC1063
ORDERD.V. Sylendra Kumar, J.1. These two revision petitions are by the tenant nd the landlord of a commercial premises bearing No 5/13, 16th Cross, Lakkasandra, Bangalore-30, measuring east-west 12 feet and north-south 12 feet, which premises...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free