Picture - Judgment Search Results

Motion Pictures Association, in Re: G.S. Mayawala and Others Vs. Motio ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1984]55CompCas375(Delhi)

Wad, J. 1. On October 1, 1981, I have passed an order appointing an administrator for the Motion Pictures Association and he has assumed charge. Ordinarily, I would have passed a reasoned order if there was sufficient

Bengal Motion Pictures Employees Union, Calcutta Vs. Kohinoor Pictures ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1964Cal519,(1965)ILLJ387Cal

same. On 18th July 1961 the Labour Commissioner, West Bengal, wrote a letter to the Secretary, Bengal Motion Picture Association, respondent No. 2, intimating that a conference would be held on the 19th July 1961 at his

Nandan Pictures Ltd. Vs. Art Pictures Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1956Cal428

terms of Clause (b) of notice. Injunction against Ujjala Cinema restraining them from selling further tickets for the Picture in dispute. Mr. Meyer states that his, clients have already delivered prints and publicity of Ujjala Cinema and

Junglee Pictures Limited vs.joy Thomas Proprietor of M/S Jubilee Pictu ...

Court: Delhi

DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2018 + CS (COMM) 1163/2018 & I.A. 13817/2018 JUNGLEE PICTURES LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms. Niyati Kohli and Ms.

Shanti Films Rep. by Its Proprietor K. Rajamanickam and R. Kavitha, Ka ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: LC2007(3)243

the plaintiff is the limited copyright owner of the 16mm Video and Television rights of the three Tamil pictures titled 'Nadodi Mannan', Adimaippenn' and 'Ulagam Sutrum Valiban' for a period of twenty years from 13.12.1990; and(ii) for

Holicow Pictures Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Prem Chandra Mishra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC913; 2008(1)CTC711; (2008)1MLJ1075(SC); 2007(14)SCALE10; 2008(4)KCCRSN280.; (2007) 14 SCC 281

greater public interest, it can be done. This can be done by keeping the writ petitioner out of picture and appointing an amicus curiae. This can only be done in exceptional cases and not in a routine

Speed Ways Picture Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)309; AIR1992SC666a; JT1996(10)SC9; (1997)1MLJ127(SC); 1996(7)SCALE880; (1996)6SCC705; [1991]3SCR472; [1996]Supp7SCR636

Matched in: Parties Speed Ways Picture Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Balaji Motion Pictures Ltd. and Another Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. ...

Court: Mumbai

PC:- 1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board. 2. This matter was moved in urgency on Friday, 1st July 2016. On that day I passed an order setting out why I was unprepared to grant...

Parasakthi Picture Mart, Rep. by Partner, S. Vairaprakasam, Sivakasi V ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Matched in: Parties Parasakthi Picture Mart, Rep. by Partner, S. Vairaprakasam, Sivakasi Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) II, Sivakasi

Prism Motion Pictures Private Limited vs.mukta Arts Limited & Anr.

Court: Delhi

+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t August, 2018. PRISM MOTION PICTURES PRIVATE LIMITED CS (COMM) 1322/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mohd. Fuzail Khan and Ms. Shafali versus Jain, Advocates. (M:9818331923)