Skip to content

Photographs - Judgment Search Results

May 11 1993

Subhash Photographics and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-11-1993

Reported in: 1994(46)ECC10; 1993LC234(SC); 1993(66)ELT3(SC); JT1993(4)SC116; 1993(2)SCALE909; 1993Supp(3)SCC323; [1993]3SCR654

services of any description such as hotels, hospitals, photographic studios, photographic film processing laboratories' etc. needs no encouragement in the shape


Apr 02 1992

Subhash Photographics Vs. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-02-1992

Reported in: 1992(3)BomCR49; 1992(62)ELT270(Bom)

the purpose of its business, it imported from Singapore certain photographic machineries. These photographic machineries, when imported, were subject to levy


May 05 1983

East India Photographic Traders' Association and Ors. Vs. State of Wes ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-05-1983

Reported in: AIR1984Cal92

also formed a Federation known as 'All India Fedration of Photographic Trades Association'. The petitioners contend that a minority group of


Feb 01 2006

S.S. Photographic Lab. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Feb-01-2006

customers for the purpose of processing the same into positive photographs and prints for delivery thereof, against some job charges and


Mar 21 1994

India Photographic Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-21-1994

Reported in: (1994)(71)ELT524TriDel

it has been confirmed that they had authorised M/s. India Photographic Co. Ltd. to file refund claims on their behalf. It


Sep 09 1983

India Photographic Co. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Saumitra Mohan Kumar

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-09-1983

Reported in: (1984)ILLJ471Cal

2 preferred by the plaintiff. Feeling aggrieved, the defendant, India Photographic Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) has preferred


May 06 1991

Procolor Photographics Private Ltd. Vs. Ocl Photo Industries (P) Ltd. ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on: May-06-1991

a concern of long standing dealing in photography, sale of photographic goods etc." as stated in para 1 of the complaints.


Jun 21 2001

Aver Photographic Company and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-21-2001

1. These cases were listed today for reporting compliance to the stay order by which pre-deposit was directed. The applicants...


Jul 30 2002

Indian Photographic Company Ltd., (Previously Kodak Limited), Madras V ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-30-2002

Reported in: [2002]128STC435(Mad)

territory of India. 2. The assessee is a dealer in photography films and equipments and for the assessment year 1976-77, the


Mar 06 1983

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. South Indian Photographic and Allied Tr ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-06-1983

Reported in: [1987]166ITR166(Mad)

who earns a living by use, conversion and sale of photographic sensitive materials.' 7. Clause V of the memorandum relating to


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial