Photographs - Judgment Search Results
Subhash Photographics and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-11-1993
Reported in: 1994(46)ECC10; 1993LC234(SC); 1993(66)ELT3(SC); JT1993(4)SC116; 1993(2)SCALE909; 1993Supp(3)SCC323; [1993]3SCR654
services of any description such as hotels, hospitals, photographic studios, photographic film processing laboratories' etc. needs no encouragement in the shape
Subhash Photographics Vs. Union of India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-02-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)BomCR49; 1992(62)ELT270(Bom)
the purpose of its business, it imported from Singapore certain photographic machineries. These photographic machineries, when imported, were subject to levy
East India Photographic Traders' Association and Ors. Vs. State of Wes ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-05-1983
Reported in: AIR1984Cal92
also formed a Federation known as 'All India Fedration of Photographic Trades Association'. The petitioners contend that a minority group of
S.S. Photographic Lab. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
customers for the purpose of processing the same into positive photographs and prints for delivery thereof, against some job charges and
India Photographic Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-1994
Reported in: (1994)(71)ELT524TriDel
it has been confirmed that they had authorised M/s. India Photographic Co. Ltd. to file refund claims on their behalf. It
India Photographic Co. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Saumitra Mohan Kumar
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-09-1983
Reported in: (1984)ILLJ471Cal
2 preferred by the plaintiff. Feeling aggrieved, the defendant, India Photographic Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) has preferred
Procolor Photographics Private Ltd. Vs. Ocl Photo Industries (P) Ltd. ...
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on: May-06-1991
a concern of long standing dealing in photography, sale of photographic goods etc." as stated in para 1 of the complaints.
Aver Photographic Company and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-21-2001
1. These cases were listed today for reporting compliance to the stay order by which pre-deposit was directed. The applicants...
Indian Photographic Company Ltd., (Previously Kodak Limited), Madras V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2002
Reported in: [2002]128STC435(Mad)
territory of India. 2. The assessee is a dealer in photography films and equipments and for the assessment year 1976-77, the
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. South Indian Photographic and Allied Tr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-06-1983
Reported in: [1987]166ITR166(Mad)
who earns a living by use, conversion and sale of photographic sensitive materials.' 7. Clause V of the memorandum relating to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »