Pharmacist - Judgment Search Results
All Kerala Pharmacist Union (Akpu) vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-13-2022
495 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 33715/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS: 1 ALL KERALA PHARMACISTS UNION (AKPU) REGISTRATION NO.TU19354/2019, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, K.P.6/2A, MALIKAPEEDIKAYIL, MAKKAD POST, KAKKODI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673 611.
Kerala Private Pharmacists Association vs the Principal Secretary (Hea ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-06-2022
N.NAGARESH THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022/16TH POUSHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 29808 OF 2021 PETITIONER: KERALA PRIVATE PHARMACIST ASSOCIATION, REGISTRATION NO.03-21/1988, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY K.P.SUNNY, KAPPADAKKADAMBATHIL HOUSE, LAVANAPADAM, KORENCHIRA P.O., PALAKKAD - 678 684.
All Kerala Pharmacists Union (Akpu) vs Rajan Namdev Khobragade
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-25-2021
WP(C). 33715/2019 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.12.2019 IN WP(C) 33715/2019(L) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/1ST PETITIONER:ALL KERALA PHARMACISTS UNION (AKPU), REGISTRATION NO.TU19354/2019, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, K.P.6/2A, MALIKAPEEDIKAYIL, MAKKAD POST, KAKKODI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. PIN-673 611
18-section briefs on any result in this list
All Kerala Pharmacists Union (Akpu), vs State of Kerala,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-25-2021
KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 6TH PHALGUNA, WP(C).No.33715 OF 2019(L) PETITIONERS: 1 ALL KERALA PHARMACISTS UNION (AKPU), REGISTRATION NO.TU19354/2019, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, K.P.6/2A, MALIKAPEEDIKAYIL, MAKKAD POST, KAKKODI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN -
Perfect Pharmacists (P) Ltd. Vs. Joint Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore
Decided on: Apr-16-2004
Reported in: (2004)140TAXMAN49Indore
In this appeal, assessee has raised various grounds but at the time of hearing learned Authorised Representative submitted that there was only one dispute i.e., whether brought forward, depreciation, loss could be set off against capital...
Kerala Govt. Ayurveda Pharmacist's Association Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA4782013 of KERALAADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DATED0304-2013 PETITIONER : - ---------------------- KERALA GOVT.AYURVEDA PHARMACIST'S ASSOCIATION, CENTRAL COMMITTEE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (REG NO20278), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT P.K. WILSON, AGED54YEARS, S/O P.M. KRISHNAN, PHARMACIST GR
State of Karnataka vs Karnataka State Government Pharmacists Associati ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560009. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B RAVINDRANATH, AGA) AND: Digitally signed byNANJUNDACHARI 1. KARNATAKA STATE GOVERNMENT Location: HIGH PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION COURT OF (AFFILIATED TO KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT KARNATAKA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION),REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI B.S.DESAI, HAVING ITS OFFICE
Malappuram District Registered Pharmacists Co-Operative Society Ltd. v ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-23-2022
MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1944 PETITIONER: MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REGISTERED PHARMACISTS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,NO.M.714, MANJERI, CHANDAKKUNNU, MANJERI.P.O, PIN-676 121, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENTS: 1
Kerala Govt. Ayurveda Pharmacist Certificate Holder'S Association, Thi ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-05-2020
2015(Z) AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA 1669/2014 DATED 07-10-2014 OF KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER: KERALA GOVT. AYURVEDA PHARMACIST CERTIFICATE HOLDER'S ASSOCIATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, AJILASH U.B., AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, RESIDING AT ROHINI,
G. Lakshmana Rao Vs. District Collector-chairman, Selection Committee ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-02-2001
Reported in: 2002(5)ALT208
the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad. She sought setting aside of appointment of the Writ Petitioner as Pharmacist Grade-II on the ground that the Writ petitioner was not eligible for the post. The applicant contended that
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free