Skip to content
Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Petty - Judgment Search Results

Mar 25 1987

Lynaugh Vs. Petty

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-25-1987

LYNAUGH v. PETTY - 480 U.S. 699 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court LYNAUGH v.


Apr 20 1959

Petty Vs. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-20-1959

Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge Comm'n - 359 U.S. 275 (1959) U.S.


1872

Merrill Vs. Petty

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1872

Merrill v. Petty - 83 U.S. 338 (1872) U.S. Supreme Court Merrill v.


Jun 09 1913

District of Columbia Vs. Petty

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-09-1913

District of Columbia v. Petty - 229 U.S. 593 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court District of


Feb 17 2012

Ramphal, Store Petty Officer Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-17-2012

Bench, New Delhi in OA No.450/2010, titled as „Ramphal, Store Petty Officer v. Union of India and Ors.‟, dismissing his application


Aug 19 1986

Vidyaranya nagar Petty Shopkeepers' Association and Ors. Vs. the Corpo ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-19-1986

Reported in: AIR1987Kant159

ORDER1. This petition was first filed by Vidyaranya nagar Petty Shopkeepers' Association. On the office objection raised, the petition was


1986

Petty Motor Company Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1986

PETTY MOTOR COMPANY v. UNITED STATES - 475 U.S. 1056 (1986)


Feb 25 1946

United States Vs. Petty Motor Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-25-1946

United States v. Petty Motor Co. - 327 U.S. 372 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court


Jan 13 2003

Kopran Ltd., S.R. Petty and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-13-2003

penalty on the appellant and on its two employees S.R. Petty and Sellappan, for the evasion of duty. The appeal is


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial