Petitioning Creditor - Judgment Search Results

Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Ad Vs. …for the Petitioning Creditor

Court: Kolkata

CHOWDHURY BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 3rd February, 2014. Mr.Madhusudan Sarkar, Mr.Dipanjan Datta, Adversus …for the petitioning creditor Mr.Kausik Chatterjee, Ms.Ruby Jaiswal, Adversus …for the company The Court : On the prayer of the counsel for … Chatterjee, Ms.Ruby Jaiswal, Adversus …for the company The Court : On the prayer of the counsel for the petitioning creditor, the company petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. All parties to act on a signed photocopy of this order

Mr. Sachidananda Pandey, Ad Vs. …for Petitioning Creditor

Court: Kolkata

LTD . BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 21st February, 2014. Ms.Manju Bhuteria, Mr.Sachidananda Pandey, Adversus …for petitioning creditor Mr.Arik Banerjee, Mr.Dipak Kr. Mukhopadhyay, Adversus …for the company The Court : This application has been filed under … of the Companies Act, 1956 on account of price of goods sold and delivered. The case of the petitioning creditor is that adveRs.quantities of flour was supplied to the company by the petitioning creditor. Thereafter bills were raised

Mr. Soroj Tulsian, Ad Vs. ...for Petitioning Creditor

Court: Kolkata

. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 21st February, 2014. Mr.Supratim Laha, Ms.Soma Rai, Mr.Soroj Tulsian, Advs...for petitioning creditor Ms.Sayani Roy Chowdhury, Adv...for the company The Court : This application has been filed under Sections 433 and … Court : This application has been filed under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioning creditor is a forwarding and clearing agent and had rendered services to the company by delivering its consignments for

Mr. Ashoke Bhowmick, Ad Vs. …for the Petitioning Creditor

Court: Kolkata

SAFETYWEARS LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 22nd April, 2014. Mr.Kausik Chatterjee, Mr.Ashoke Bhowmick, Adversus …for the petitioning creditor Mr.Ranjit kr. Jaiswal, Mr.Sekhar Pal, Adversus …for the company The Court : The claim which arises in this … The claim which arises in this winding up application is on account of inter-corporate loan advanced by the petitioning creditor to the company. That a sum of Rs.5 lakh was given as loan has been disputed by the

Mrs. Rahmath Bi Vs. Angappa Raja (Petitioning Creditor) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1969)2MLJ518

Venkataraman, J.1. This is an application filed by one Mrs. Rahmath Bi to implead her as the second petitioning creditor in I.P. No. 31 of 1967. The facts giving rise to this application are these:I.P. No. 31 of … so should not be allowed to get over the bar of limitation, by being impleaded as the second petitioning creditor in the petition, I.P. No. 31 of 1967, filed by Angappa Raja.7. The relevant statutory provisions are these:8.