Petitioner - Judgment Search Results
…petitioner Vs. Dalhousie Properties Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-22-2016
in paragraph 2 of their written statement by contending as follows:“the defendant is a monthly tenant of the plaintiff in respect of room nos. 40 to 44 .......”. The PW1 during cross-examination (vide question No.109) was asked
Petitioner Vs. Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present : The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Biswanath Somadder. WP959of 2013 Kariwala Industries Limited …..…..Writ Petitioner versus Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone & ORS.……..Respondents For the Writ Petitioner : Mr.J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate, with
Petitioner. Vs. State of West Bengal.
Court: Kolkata Appellate
Decided on: Mar-15-2011
Tribunal in T.A.88 of 2003 arising out of W.P.No.18080 (W) of 1997. 2. The learned Advocate representing the petitioners submits that the State respondents wrongfully and illegally granted patta in favour of the respondent no.8 (since deceased)
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Petitioner Vs. State of West Bengal.
Court: Kolkata Appellate
Decided on: Nov-25-2010
challenge the said order, we have no other alternative but to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to join the service immediately and also to grant other consequential service benefits without any further delay but
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
respective counsel for the respondents clearly established that the present petition is liable to be dismissed as the petitioner has failed to establish the need and requirement to curtail the freedom of speech and expression. ... 79.
. . . .Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Puneet Bali, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Vibhav Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Kulvir Narwal, Addl. A.G.Haryana. ***** A.K.SIKRI, C.J.(ORAL) Notice of motion. We have gone though the records produced by
………..Petitioner Vs. Synergy Ispat Private Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-09-2012
in Jharkhand or to deal with in any manner whatsoever without 2 fiRs.offering the entire extract to the petitioner (respondent herein) in terms of the agreement. The learned Trial Judge after granting aforesaid ad interim relief has
………… Petitioner Vs. India Infoline Limited and Another
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-28-2014
of : THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996; And In the matter of: CENTRAL BUSINESS SERVICES LIMITED ………… Petitioner versus INDIA INFOLINE LIMITED & ANOTHER ……… Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Advocate with Jishnu Chowdhury, Soumya
………… Petitioner Vs. Shri Krishnakant Balkishan Laddha and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side In the matter of: Scope Commodeal Private Limited ………… Petitioner versus Shri Krishnakant Balkishan Laddha & Anr. ……… Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Debnath Ghosh with Mr.Suvashish Sengupta, Mr.Avijit
….Petitioner Vs. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and ors
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
Trustees for the Port of Kolkata & Ors …Respondents Appearance: Mr.Shaktinath Mukherjee,Sr.Adv.Mr.Kishore Dutt, Mr.Soumya Majumdar, …for the Writ petitioners Mr.Arunava Ghosh. Sr.Adv.Mr.Somnath Bose …for the Respondent Heard On: - 26.08.2014 Judgement On: - 01.09.2014 I.P.Mukerji, J. The
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free