Persons - Judgment Search Results
Bush Vs. Person
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1855
Bush v. Person - 59 U.S. 82 (1855) U.S. Supreme Court Bush v. Person, 59 U.S. 18 How. 82 82 (1855)
Estate of Late S.V. Rajammal (by Accountable Person S.V. Venkatasubbu) ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-13-1990
Reported in: [1992]197ITR55(Mad)
the authorities below. On a reference to the court, the argument was that the bequest was to seven persons, named in the will, as tenants-in-common and, therefore, only one-seventh share could be included as part of the
Personal Manager, Sbi and anr. Vs. Krishna Grameena Bank Employees Uni ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-28-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)KarLJ62; (2008)ILLJ894SC; 2007(3)SCALE575; 2007AIRSCW7669; 2008–I-LLJ-894; 2008LabIC474; 2007(8)Supreme675; 2008(2)KLJ62; 2008(1)AIRKarR330
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dismissing the writ appeal filed by the appellant.2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:3....
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Director (Personal), Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Vs. R. Senat ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-2007
Reported in: AIR2007Mad118; [2007]135CompCas329(Mad); (2007)1CompLJ272(Mad); 2007(208)ELT3(Mad); (2007)1MLJ1; [2007]75SCL20(Mad)
of birth without corresponding correction in School records. The petitioner pointed out orders granted in favour of other persons without such correction in School records. This was rejected in 1989. In the meantime the petitioner applied to
Tainwala Personal Care Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Royal Sundaram Alliance ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-07-2012
Oral Judgment: 1. This application arises under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In pursuance of a proposal submitted by the Applicant for the issuance of a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy,...
Personal Interview Total Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
has been opened. The criteria is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:- “Total Marks of the Viva-voce:100. Marks 1. Personal Achievements 40 marks a) Academic Qualifications: i) B.Tech. 10 marks FiRs.Division:10. marks Second Division:07. marks ii) Master of
Personal Interview Total Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
has been opened. The criteria is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:- “Total Marks of the Viva-voce:100. Marks 1. Personal Achievements 40 marks a) Academic Qualifications: i) B.Tech. 10 marks FiRs.Division:10. marks Second Division:07. marks ii) Master of
a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
discretion for the Courts to refuse to exercise their extraordinary powers under Article 226 in the case of persons who do not approach it expeditiously for relief and who stand by and allow things to happen and
“a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
for the Courts to refuse to exercise their extra ordinary powers under Article 226 in the case of persons who do not approach it expeditiously for relief and who stand by and allow things to happen and
“sports Person (Punjab) Vs. State of Punjab and Others --respondents
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
at Annexure P-3. Under such advertisement one post of Junior Engineer (Electrical) had been reserved for the S.C.Sports Person. To claim benefit of such reservation, it was clearly stipulated in the following terms:- “SPORTS PERSON (PUNJAB) A
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free