Personal Right - Judgment Search Results

Bush Vs. Person

Court: US Supreme Court

lawful rights of married women, or minors, or any liens, mortgages, or other securities on property, real or personal, which may be valid by the laws of the states respectively, and which are not inconsistent with the … this proviso: "That nothing in this act contained shall be construed to annul, destroy, or impair any lawful rights of married women, or minors, or any liens, mortgages, or other securities on property, real or personal, which

Estate of Late S.V. Rajammal (by Accountable Person S.V. Venkatasubbu) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1992]197ITR55(Mad)

1980 : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the deceased had only a right of control and management over the Indo-Commercial Syndicate Mills, … reference to agricultural lands : 'She shall have power to sell, mortgage, lease or to do direct cultivation personally or through a duly appointed agent of her choice, of my agricultural lands in Sandhegoundenpalayam village, Pollachi Taluk,

Personal Manager, Sbi and anr. Vs. Krishna Grameena Bank Employees Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)KarLJ62; (2008)ILLJ894SC; 2007(3)SCALE575; 2007AIRSCW7669; 2008–I-LLJ-894; 2008LabIC474; 2007(8)Supreme675; 2008(2)KLJ62; 2008(1)AIRKarR330

of remedy available in law by delay itself, lapse of time results in losing the remedy and the right as well. The delay would certainly be fatal if it has resulted in material evidence relevant to adjudication … National Tribunal passed an award directing that the officers and employees of the RRBs. will be entitled to claim parity with their counterparts in the sponsor bank in the matter of pay scale with effect from 1.9.1987.

The Director (Personal), Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Vs. R. Senat ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2007Mad118; [2007]135CompCas329(Mad); (2007)1CompLJ272(Mad); 2007(208)ELT3(Mad); (2007)1MLJ1; [2007]75SCL20(Mad)

he has given wrong date of birth of the plaintiff. In Ex.A.1 to A3 the name of the person is left blank. Ex.A.4 is related to a person born on 20.8.1964 to one Ramasamy Gounder and Rathinam … has not moved his employer-D3 for the change of date of birth in his service records. So as rightly held in the above dictum of the Apex Court, the plaintiff is not entitled to ask for the

Tainwala Personal Care Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Royal Sundaram Alliance ...

Court: Mumbai

this Policy. It is hereby expressly stipulated and declared that it shall be a condition precedent to any right of action or suit upon this Policy that the award by such arbitrator/arbitrators of the amount of the … 287) where the Supreme Court held thus:- “12. ................But as soon as there is a rejection of the claim and not the raising of a dispute as to the amount of any loss or damage, the only

Personal Interview Total Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

has been opened. The criteria is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:- “Total Marks of the Viva-voce:100. Marks 1. Personal Achievements 40 marks a) Academic Qualifications: i) B.Tech. 10 marks FiRs.Division:10. marks Second Division:07. marks ii) Master of

Personal Interview Total Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

has been opened. The criteria is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:- “Total Marks of the Viva-voce:100. Marks 1. Personal Achievements 40 marks a) Academic Qualifications: i) B.Tech. 10 marks FiRs.Division:10. marks Second Division:07. marks ii) Master of

a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

at vest within a period of one year. The observations of Hon'ble Apex Court are as under:- "A person aggrieved by an order of promoting a junior over his head should approach the Court at least within

“a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the court in considering legitimate grievances as also its normal work. We consider that the High court was right in dismissing the appellant's CWP No.13964 of 2013 -3- petition as well as the appeal”.In view of the … versus State of Tamilnadu, AIR 197.(SC) 2271 would be relevant and the same are in the following terMs.“A person aggrieved by an order of promoting a junior over his head should approach the Court at least within

“sports Person (Punjab) Vs. State of Punjab and Others --respondents

Court: Punjab and Haryana

at Annexure P-3. Under such advertisement one post of Junior Engineer (Electrical) had been reserved for the S.C.Sports Person. To claim benefit of such reservation, it was clearly stipulated in the following terms:- “SPORTS PERSON (PUNJAB) A