Personal Right - Judgment Search Results

Bush Vs. Person

Court: US Supreme Court

settled doctrine of this Court not only that no existing personal liability is necessary to work an estoppel, but that none shall be construed to annul, destroy, or impair any lawful rights of married women, or minors, or any liens, mortgages, or

Tainwala Personal Care Products Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC642

1. When the petition for stay came up for hearing it was agreed by both sides that the appeal can...

Personal Manager, Sbi and anr. Vs. Krishna Grameena Bank Employees Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)KarLJ62; (2008)ILLJ894SC; 2007(3)SCALE575; 2007AIRSCW7669; 2008–I-LLJ-894; 2008LabIC474; 2007(8)Supreme675; 2008(2)KLJ62; 2008(1)AIRKarR330

officers and employees of the RRBs. will be entitled to claim parity with their counterparts in the sponsor bank in the lapse of time results in losing the remedy and the right as well. The delay would certainly be fatal if it

The Manager Personal Banking Division State Bank of India, Madras, Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)2MLJ280

Order IX, Rule 9, CPC. The learned IV Assistant City Civil Judge, Madras, allowed I.A.No.18390 of 1990 and restored the suit

Tainwala Personal Care Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Royal Sundaram Alliance ...

Court: Mumbai

................But as soon as there is a rejection of the claim and not the raising of a dispute as to the declared that it shall be a condition precedent to any right of action or suit upon this Policy that the award

M/S. Personality Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise Bangal ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Per P. Karthikeyan This is an appeal filed by M/s. Personality Ltd., Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore. The impugned order sustained the order knowledge about suppression, fraud etc. 3. We find that as rightly argued by the appellants citing the judgment of the Apex

The Authorized Person Coca-cola Company Products Ltd., Atmakuru Villag ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

marked. On behalf of the opposite party no.1, its authorized person has filed affidavit and did not choose to file any

Private Secretaries/Personal Assistants Brotherhood and Another Vs. St ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2000(1)AWC457; (2000)1UPLBEC357

with the approval of the Governor.4. The Private Secretaries and Personal Assistants Brotherhood filed a Writ Petition Bearing No. 1408 of

a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

The observations of Hon'ble Apex Court are as under:- "A person aggrieved by an order of promoting a junior over his

“a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

extra ordinary powers under Article 226 in the case of persons who do not approach it expeditiously for relief and who its normal work. We consider that the High court was right in dismissing the appellant's CWP No.13964 of 2013 -3- petition