Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Personal Office - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 15 2008

L. Parmeswaran Vs. Chief Personal Officer and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-15-2008

Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR1268; [2008(116)FLR1025]; JT2008(2)SC547; (2008)2MLJ1127(SC); 2008(2)SCALE543; (2008)3SCC649; 2008(2)SLJ489(SC); 2008(1)LC364(SC); 2008AIRSCW1594; 2008(2)Supreme186

effect from the date of their assuming higher responsibilities.2. They should advise their willingness or otherwise to this office within 15 days from the date of receipt of this office order failure to do so i.e. if … there would be a fall in emoluments is only natural and unavoidable consequence which is common when a person is repatriated to the parent cadre from an ex-cadre post.6. A writ petition was filed thereagainst before the


Oct 26 1990

A. Sagayanathan and Others Vs. Divisional Personal Officer, S.B.C. Div ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-26-1990

Reported in: AIR1991SC424; 1991LabIC206; 1992Supp(2)SCC172

the facts of this case, because, the observations in those cases are based on the fact that the person admitted as a partner in the firm seeking registration was admitted as an individual, whereas in the present … of the proceedings for the registration of the assessee-firm all its partners had stated before the Income- tax Officer that G was a partner in the as firm, not in his individual capacity but on behalf of


Nov 01 1983

Kunhipathumma and anr. Vs. the Divisional Personal Officer

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-01-1983

Reported in: II(1984)ACC151

died on 21-5-1983 after the order against which the appeal is sought to be filed was posted. The office expressed doubt regarding the maintainability of the application under Section 151 C.P.C. for impleading the petitioners in the … Act). The term workmen as defined in Section 2(n) of the Act reads as follows:(n) 'workman' means any person (other than a person whose employment is of a casual nature and who is employed otherwise than for


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 02 2008

Union of India (Uoi) Through Senior Divisional Personal Officer, East ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Apr-02-2008

Reported in: [2008(2)JCR502(Jhr)]

voluntarily retired from service with effect from 25.5.2003. Aggrieved by that, Union of India through the Senior Divisional Personal Officer, East Central Railways, Dhanbad, has filed the writ petition before this Court, seeking quashing of the order … M. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.J.1. Dinesh Prasad Chaturvedi, respondent No. 2, working as Chief Office Superintendent in East Central Railways, Dhanbad, applied for voluntary retirement to the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central


Jul 26 2010

Om Shakti Sc/ St Akd Minority Credit Co-operative Society Limited. Vs. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-26-2010

Matched in: Parties Om Shakti Sc/ St Akd Minority Credit Co-operative Society Limited. Vs. Mr. Akhil Agarwal Divisional Personnel Officer , Shri Raju G.F Assistant Personal Officer, Shri G.R.S. Rao Working as Divisional Personal Officer South , Shri Amarnath Dhubay Senior Divisional Personal Officer


Jul 02 2012

A.Prathaban. Vs. the Joint Registrar or Personal Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-02-2012

Matched in: Parties A.Prathaban. Vs. the Joint Registrar or Personal Officer


Jul 02 2012

Northern Railway Jagadhari Workshop Jagadhari District Yamuna Nagar Ha ...

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on: Jul-02-2012

of Rs.477/- per month was started from the salary of the deceased and the same sent to the office of LIC authority upto the month of September 2005, but the deduction of the premium towards LIC from … after three months from the date of death of deceased till its realization. The District Forum allowed the claim against the petitioner only wherein the above mentioned reliefs were granted in all the three cases. 5. Aggrieved


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial