Permitted Use - Judgment Search Results
M.P.A.i.T. Permit Owners Assn. and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-28-2003
Reported in: I(2004)ACC301; (SCSuppl)2004(1)CHN175; JT2003(9)SC540; 2004(3)MPHT175; 2004MPLJ210(SC); 2003(10)SCALE38; (2004)1SCC320; MANU/SC/1108/2003
in the same field and, therefore, they operate in totally different fields and stated that holding of a permit is a cognate matter and there is no encroachment made on the MV Act by the Act including … general for the State of Madhya Pradesh, contended that the Act in question is aimed at curbing the user of the motor vehicles not covered by a permit or using the permit in violation of its condition
Sonebhadra Minor Mineral Lease/Permit Holders Association and ors. Vs. ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-18-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)AWC2791
M. Katju and D. R. Chaudhary, JJ.1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner No. 1 is an Association of Minor Mineral Lease Holders of Sonebhadra district, and the other petitioners are its members. They have...
M.P. All India Tourist Permit Owners Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-09-2000
Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT15
vehicles are required to pay taxes as mentioned in Entry IV to 1st Schedule. With respect to vehicles permitted to ply as deluxe or express service, tax is payable for every passenger which the vehicle is permitted … shall be made if it is proved to the satisfaction of the Taxation Authority that the vehicle was used under valid documents required under the Act. Sub-section (5) of Section 16 as inserted by the Amendment Act
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free