Permanable - Judgment Search Results

Indian Railway Permanent Way Inspectors' Association and Anr. Vs. Unio ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC2348; JT1997(3)SC445; (1997)IILLJ36SC; (1997)9SCC272; [1997]2SCR452

order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras, made on 13.9.96 in O.A. No. 1369/93. The petitioners are the Permanent Way Inspectors in the pay scale of Rs. 1400-2300. They had sought the pay scale of Rs. 1600-2660

Purasawalkam Permanent Fund Limited vs M. Dharumarajan (Died), 1. D. K ...

Court: Chennai

on:29.01.2026 Pronounced on: 06.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP. No.6195 of 2025 and CMP. No.30553 of 2025 The Purasawalkam Permanent Fund Limited, Having Office at “Appandurai Buildings”, No.173, Vellala Street, Purasawalkam, Chennai - 600 084. Petitioner(s) Vs M.Dharumarajan

Kerala Permanent Benefit Fund Ltd vs M.V.Pradeep

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 19th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 28TH KARTHIKA, 1943 RFA NO. 281 OF 2016 (I) AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED...

The Permanent Poura Karmikas vs Mysore Nagara Palike

Court: Karnataka

OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.4554 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:1. THE PERMANENT POURA KARMIKASAND CONTRACT BASIS POURA KARMIKAS MAHA SANGHA (R) MYSURU, A TRADE UNIONS ACT, 1926, HAVING ITS REGISTERED

Permanent Magnets Ltd. Vs. the Workmen Employed and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(6)ALLMR72; (2007)ILLJ984Bom

of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The State Government referred an industrial dispute relating to the demand for permanency of 43 casual workmen for adjudication before the Industrial Tribunal. During the pendency of the Reference, some of

Permanent Magnets Ltd. Vs. Shri Umashankar Pandey,

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(3)ALLMR211; 2006(2)BomCR398

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. Perused the record and proceedings received as per the order . passed on 24.1.2005. The Petitioners-Company has challenged the judgment and order dated 28.4.2004 passed...

“she Is Permanent Resident of House No. 1091/1 Kaith Majri Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CRM-A No.407-MA of 2012 -2- The trial Judge has noted following facts from her complaint :- “She is permanent resident of House No.1091/1, Kaith Majri, Ambala City. Her son's Ashwani marriage solemnized with accused Reema daughter of

“suit for Permanent Injunction Restraining the Vs. Tarlochan Singh a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

in the memo of parties of this appeal, filed the instant suit seeking the following relief: “Suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from disconnecting the electric connection with account number A-829-AP (Tubewell) from the tubewell of

Permanent Magnets Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Vinod Vishnu Wani

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(1)ALLMR797; 2002(1)BomCR310; (2002)4BOMLR6; [2002(93)FLR32]; 2002(3)MhLj413

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties, Perused the records.2. Since a common question of law arises in all these five petitions, they are being heard together and being disposed of by this...

Permanent Magnets Ltd. Vs. Vasant Ganu Patekar and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(3)BomCR738; [2001(89)FLR247]; (2001)ILLJ1358Bom

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner, in its anxiety to make the unit economically viable, introduced on October 12, 1997 a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS). Under the scheme the employees were given one month's period from October...