Perfumery - Judgment Search Results
indra Perfumery Co. Thr. Sudershab Oberoi Vs. Presiding Officer and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2003
Reported in: 109(2004)DLT927; 2004(74)DRJ619; [2004(101)FLR940]; (2004)IILLJ413Del; 2004(3)SLJ78(Delhi)
ORDER1. This matter has been placed before the Division Bench in view of the order dated 6.3.2003 made by the...
Mahendra Perfumery Works Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-08-1984
Reported in: [2000]74STC118(Kar)
ORDERS. Rajashekhara Murthy, J.1. This arises out of the order of the Tribunal dated September 27, 1979 in S.T.A. No....
Emgee Perfumery Works Vs. Enforcement Directorate, Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-1994
Reported in: 1994(71)ELT9(Mad)
ORDER1. This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. V. Thiruvenkatachari,...
Puspa Perfumery Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-04-1991
Reported in: [1992]194ITR248(Cal)
running business of the firm of similar name, namely, Puspa Perfumery Products. The agreement in pursuance of which the business of
indra Perfumery Co. and ors. Vs. Moti Lal Lalu Mal and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-13-1966
Reported in: AIR1969Delhi14
rented out by the respondents to the appellants Messrs Indra Perfumery Company. There are three partners of this company, namely, Nanak
The Andhra Perfumery Works Joint Family Concerns Vs. Karupakula Suryan ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-1967
Reported in: AIR1969Mad126
of the fact involved.4. In both the appeals, the Andhra Perfumery Works, a joint family concern represented by its Manager, is
Charu Perfumery Works Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Feb-06-1997
Reported in: (1997)(92)ELT243Tri(Chennai)
SDR for the Department. He has pleaded that in the perfumery trade so many grades of a particular oil are imported
J.M. Perfumery Unit-ii Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-08-2004
Reported in: (2004)(171)ELT20Tri(Mum.)bai
as is usually the case, they are put up as perfumery or as medicaments. As such it is the contention of
J.M. Perfumery Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-14-2004
Reported in: (2005)(179)ELT241Tri(Mum.)bai
confirmed on the allegation and findings on clandestine removal of perfumery compound to one M/s Suresh Enterprises. The evidence for confirming
Premier Perfumery Works Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Dec-06-2004
Reported in: (2005)(184)ELT108Tri(Bang.)
1. The appellant is seeking stay of recovery and waiver of pre-deposit of Rs. 33,327/-. The appellants are manufacturers of...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »