Perfumer - Judgment Search Results

industrial Perfumes Ltd. Vs. Industrial Perfumes Workers Union

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1998(79)FLR367]; (1998)IILLJ1177Bom

was as under:-'That all the workers be given work with immediate effect in the factory of M/s Industrial Perfumes Ltd., at Hay Bunder Road, Sewri, Mumbai- 400 033.It is pointed out that after this reference the closure

Baccarose Perfumes And Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau Of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

2024 INSC662REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3216 OF2024BACCAROSE PERFUMES AND BEAUTY PRODUCTS PVT. LTD …APPELLANT VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. … RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT AUGUSTINE GEORGE

Gupta Perfumers (P) Ltd Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission and Other ...

Court: Delhi

confiscate.” The impugned order passed by the Settlement Commission deserves to be upheld for the petitioner herein- Gupta Perfumers (P) Ltd. it is apparent is caught in their own web, which they stoutly and strongly deny. Even

Alcome Perfumes and Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorised Vs. M/S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1550-2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.8.2014 Alcome Perfumes and Cosmetics PVT.LTD.through its authorised signatory Ms.Priyanka Manghani and others ...Petitioners Versus M/s SND Distributors through its partner

Indian Perfumes and Flavours and anr. Vs. Customs and Excise Settlemen ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 142(2007)DLT215

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The Petitioner is from the State of Uttar Pradesh. The show-cause notice dated 9th March, 2006 was issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise Division-V, NOIDA (Uttar Pradesh).2. Even though the impugned...

Garden Perfume (P) Ltd. Vs. Anand-soaps and Detergents

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1994IAD(Delhi)115; 53(1994)DLT244; 1994(28)DRJ112

J.K. Merha, J. (1) The petitioner had adopted the trade mark 'RAINY' in respect of soaps and they are the proprietors of this trade mark. It is alleged that the defendant has dishonestly copied the trade...

Baccarose Perfumes and Beauty Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Kandla

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(147)ELT923Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The application is for waiver of deposit of penalty imposed on the applicant of Rs. 10 lakhs imposed on the applicant under Clause (a) and (o) of Section 111 of the Act and further penalty...

Baccorose Perfumes and Beauty Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

raw material and subject them to the following process - i) The unfilled bottles/godets/tubes/containers etc. are imported. The perfumes/deodorant /eau de toilette/Cream/make up mass etc to be filled in is separately imported in bulk quantity. Besides, various

Baccarose Perfumes and Beauty Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

(hereinafter referred to as KAFTZ for short), where they engage themselves in the activity of manufacturing bottled spray perfumes, eau-de-toilette, deodorant etc.1.2 The processes carried out on the raw material imported and indigenously procured are - i)

Khattri Perfumers (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Cit, Special Range-11

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Reported in: (2006)7SOT675Luck

by the learned counsel for the assessee that the assessee was a manufacturer of a wide range of perfumery products used in industrial perfumes, chewing tobacco, synthetic paints, soaps of all types etc. It was contended that