Performing Right - Judgment Search Results

Phonographic Performance Ltd. Vs. Music Broadcast (P) Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(3)ALLMR196; 2004(29)PTC282(Bom)

Hanfastangel v. Empire Palace, reported in (1894) 3 Chancellory 109 at 128 and the judgment of the Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Eastern Indian Motion Picture Association and Ors. reported in : [1977]3SCR206 . It is further

Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.C.,Vapi

Court: Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5805-5807 OF2009|SARLA PERFORMANCE FIBERS LTD. |.....APPELLANT(S) | |VERSUS | | |COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, | | |VAPI |.....RESPONDENT(S) |

Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Dalia and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10643-10644 OF2010Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. ... Appellant Vs. Sanjay Dalia & Anr. ... Respondents (With C.A. No.4912/2015 @ SLP [C]. … Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10643-10644 OF2010Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. ... Appellant Vs. Sanjay Dalia & Anr. ... Respondents (With C.A. No.4912/2015 @ SLP [C]. No.8253/2013)

Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. Etc. Vs. C.C.E., Surat-Ii

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3555-3560 OF2012Sarla Performance Fibers Limited ... Appellant(s) Etc. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, ... Respondent(s) Surat-II JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.The appellant … deserved to be upheld. As regards penalty on the company, the learned member held that it had been rightly imposed under Section 11AC of the Act read with Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. As far

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Eastern Indian Motion Picture ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC1443; (1977)2SCC820; [1977]3SCR206

the same by engaging the same person.2. The facts giving rise to the appeal are : The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as 'the IPRS'), the appellant before us, was … cinematograph films provided such lyrical and musical' works were printed or written and that they could assign the performing right in public to the IPRS. The Copyright Board further held that the tariff as published by the IPRS

Performing Right Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1973; [1977]106ITR11(SC); (1976)4SCC37; [1977]1SCR171a; 1976(8)LC745(SC)

A.C. Gupta, J.1. The first appellant, Performing Right Society Limited, (hereinafter called the Society) is a company incorporated under the (English) Companies Acts, 1908 and 1913, … is an association of composers, authors and publishers of copyright musical works established to grant permission for the performing right in such works. 'Performing right' means the right of performing in public, broadcasting and causing to be transmitted

Phonographic Performance Limited Vs. Tv Today Network Limited and Anr.

Court: Kolkata

2015 CS No.135 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LIMITED -VersusTV TODAY NETWORK LIMITED & ANR. Appearance: Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Sarvapriyo Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Satadeep Bhattacharyya, Adv.Mr.Sarajit Biswas, Adv...for the … expired on 4th July, 2010. All such licences The dispute arose with regard to the exploitation of such rights by the defendant no.1 beyond the licence period. The defendant no.1 has relied upon Clause 5.4 of one

Phonographic Performance Ltd vs.ht Media Ltd

Court: Delhi

the negative. The plaintiff had filed the present suit praying for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from performing and communicating to the public the sound recordings in question, by way of a mechanical device and other … the sound recordings in question. It is further averred that the plaintiff company has been granted the exclusive right to enforce the copyright in the said sound recordings, including but not limited to granting licenses for the

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd vs.anil Mehra & Anr

Court: Delhi

$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 632/2006 THE INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anu Bagai, Mr. Himanshu Bagai and … counsel for the plaintiff has also contended that this application is premised purely on CS(OS) No.1185/2006 titled India Performing Right Society Vs. Aditya Pandey and which has nothing to do with the matter which is being argued in

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd vs.aditya Pandey and Anr

Court: Delhi

CS(OS) No.1185/2006 & IA No.11203/2016 (of the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC). THE INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Himanshu Bagai, Adv. versus ADITYA PANDEY … Abhishek Malhotra and Mr. Angad S. Dugal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. instituted this suit, as per amended plaint dated 3rd April, 2009, for permanent injunction restraining the