Perfective - Judgment Search Results

Perfect Pac Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Also Dy. Cit V ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1993)46TTJ(Del)438

ORDERR. M. MEHTA, A.M. :These are cross-appeals filed by both the parties against the order passed by the CIT(A) raising...

Perfect Cartons Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(12)LC76Tri(Delhi)

this appeal by M/s. Perfect Cartons. No appeal of M/s. Perfect Agencies is before us. (i) unity of ownership of both

Perfect Forging and Fabricators, Vs. Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

is further contended that penalty could not be imposed on Perfect and its partner as the same time.3. The departmental representative

Perfect Refractories and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC575

Jabalpur, manufacturing Firebricks and Fire clay and Mortars. iii. M/s. Perfect Sanitary Pipes, Bharatpur, both manufacturing crushed clay for captive consumption

Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1989MPLJ793; [1990]76STC475(MP)

to be the business of the assessee. The Board was perfectly right in saying that even if during the course of

Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1996]221ITR210(MP)

was a mistake in allowing the said investment allowance. The Perfect Sanitary Pipes, Bharatpur unit of the assessee was engaged in

Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. and S.P. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(102)ECC287

the original authority imposing penalty of Rs. 3,06,574 on M/s Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. but reduced the penalty imposed on Shri

Perfect Industrial Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Offi ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(2)MPLJ632

ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...

Perfect Electric Concern (P) L Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

narrated in the writ petition are that, the petitionercompany namely, Perfect Electric Concern (P) Ltd. was established in the year, 1960.

M/S Perfect Caps and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

has been held that Shri R. Laxman, Manager of M/s Perfect Caps and M/s Perfect Closures have actively connived in various