Perfectional - Judgment Search Results

Perfect Pac Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Also Dy. Cit V ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1993)46TTJ(Del)438

ORDERR. M. MEHTA, A.M. :These are cross-appeals filed by both the parties against the order passed by the CIT(A) raising...

Perfect Cartons Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(12)LC76Tri(Delhi)

are as to whether :- (a) the Appellant and M/s. Perfect Agencies are two different entities; (b) if not, the value

Perfect Forging and Fabricators, Vs. Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

to Rs. 1 lakhs, penalties imposed on the importer and Perfect reduced to Rs. 10,000/- each.

Perfect Refractories and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC575

and dutiable. 2.1. The facts in brief are that M/s. Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. have three manufacturing units as under: i.

Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1989MPLJ793; [1990]76STC475(MP)

to be the business of the assessee. The Board was perfectly right in saying that even if during the course of

Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1996]221ITR210(MP)

was a mistake in allowing the said investment allowance. The Perfect Sanitary Pipes, Bharatpur unit of the assessee was engaged in

Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. and S.P. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(102)ECC287

quite clear. Therefore, penalty is imposable on the appellants, M/s. Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. However, considering the fact that the appellants

Perfect Industrial Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Offi ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(2)MPLJ632

ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...

Perfect Electric Concern (P) L Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

name of Smt. Kuthru Kundaram and in this manner she perfected her title. The land in question has been purchased from

M/S Perfect Caps and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

hand she has held that in the case of M/s Perfect Caps suppression cannot be said to have been made with