Perfection - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: perfection Page 1 of about 129 results (0.005 seconds)Perfect Pac Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Also Dy. Cit V ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: (1993)46TTJ(Del)438
ORDERR. M. MEHTA, A.M. :These are cross-appeals filed by both the parties against the order passed by the CIT(A) raising...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Cartons Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1987)(12)LC76Tri(Delhi)
during 1982-83 and Rs. 1,10,684.32 during 1983-84 ostensibly by M/s. Perfect Agencies, in the premises of the appellant, (iii) the ineligibility
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Forging and Fabricators, Vs. Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
of Perfect Forging & Fabricators, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as Perfect).After investigation that has been spread over a period of three
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Refractories and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC575
Co. Ltd. have three manufacturing units as under: i. M/s. Perfect Refractories, Jabalpur, manufacturing Firebricks and Fire clay and Mortars. iii.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: 1989MPLJ793; [1990]76STC475(MP)
were not used for carrying his goods manufactured in the Perfect Potteries. These contentions were rejected by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: [1996]221ITR210(MP)
(for short, 'the Act'), of Rs. 1,17,003 attributable to the Perfect Sanitary Pipes, Bharatpur unit. In the original assessment completed by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Thread Mills Ltd. and S.P. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2005)(102)ECC287
quite clear. Therefore, penalty is imposable on the appellants, M/s. Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. However, considering the fact that the appellants
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Industrial Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Offi ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: 1999(2)MPLJ632
ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Electric Concern (P) L Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2710 of 2007 Perfect Electric Concern (P) Ltd., P.O. & P.S. Sunder Nagar, District
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Perfect Caps and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
hand she has held that in the case of M/s Perfect Caps suppression cannot be said to have been made with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>