Perfect - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: perfect Page 1 of about 129 results (0.019 seconds)Perfect Pac Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Also Dy. Cit V ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: (1993)46TTJ(Del)438
ORDERR. M. MEHTA, A.M. :These are cross-appeals filed by both the parties against the order passed by the CIT(A) raising...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Cartons Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1987)(12)LC76Tri(Delhi)
Rs. 7,02,362.27 for 1983-84 in value was attributable to M/s. Perfect Agencies - an independent partnership concern - who had merely
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Forging and Fabricators, Vs. Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
18.11.1998 seized this machine which was in the premises of Perfect Forging & Fabricators, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as Perfect).After investigation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Refractories and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC575
that show cause dated 19.9.90 had been issued to M/s. Perfect Sanitarywares Ltd. demanding duty on batch mixture manufactured during the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: 1989MPLJ793; [1990]76STC475(MP)
to be the business of the assessee. The Board was perfectly right in saying that even if during the course of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: [1996]221ITR210(MP)
was a mistake in allowing the said investment allowance. The Perfect Sanitary Pipes, Bharatpur unit of the assessee was engaged in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Thread Mills Ltd. and S.P. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2005)(102)ECC287
quite clear. Therefore, penalty is imposable on the appellants, M/s. Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. However, considering the fact that the appellants
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Industrial Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Offi ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: 1999(2)MPLJ632
ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPerfect Electric Concern (P) L Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
name of Smt. Kuthru Kundaram and in this manner she perfected her title. The land in question has been purchased from
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Perfect Caps and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
hand she has held that in the case of M/s Perfect Caps suppression cannot be said to have been made with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>