Perfect - Judgment Search Results

Perfect Pac Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Also Dy. Cit V ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1993)46TTJ(Del)438

ORDERR. M. MEHTA, A.M. :These are cross-appeals filed by both the parties against the order passed by the CIT(A) raising...

Perfect Cartons Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(12)LC76Tri(Delhi)

Rs. 7,02,362.27 for 1983-84 in value was attributable to M/s. Perfect Agencies - an independent partnership concern - who had merely

Perfect Forging and Fabricators, Vs. Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

18.11.1998 seized this machine which was in the premises of Perfect Forging & Fabricators, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as Perfect).After investigation

Perfect Refractories and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC575

that show cause dated 19.9.90 had been issued to M/s. Perfect Sanitarywares Ltd. demanding duty on batch mixture manufactured during the

Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1989MPLJ793; [1990]76STC475(MP)

to be the business of the assessee. The Board was perfectly right in saying that even if during the course of

Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1996]221ITR210(MP)

was a mistake in allowing the said investment allowance. The Perfect Sanitary Pipes, Bharatpur unit of the assessee was engaged in

Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. and S.P. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(102)ECC287

quite clear. Therefore, penalty is imposable on the appellants, M/s. Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. However, considering the fact that the appellants

Perfect Industrial Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Offi ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(2)MPLJ632

ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...

Perfect Electric Concern (P) L Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

name of Smt. Kuthru Kundaram and in this manner she perfected her title. The land in question has been purchased from

M/S Perfect Caps and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

hand she has held that in the case of M/s Perfect Caps suppression cannot be said to have been made with