Perfect - Judgment Search Results

Perfect Pac Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Also Dy. Cit V ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1993)46TTJ(Del)438

ORDERR. M. MEHTA, A.M. :These are cross-appeals filed by both the parties against the order passed by the CIT(A) raising...

Perfect Cartons Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(12)LC76Tri(Delhi)

quantities manufactured by both the appellant as well as M/s. Perfect Agencies are aggregated, and (iv) contravention of various rules, and

Perfect Forging and Fabricators, Vs. Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

is further contended that penalty could not be imposed on Perfect and its partner as the same time.3. The departmental representative

Perfect Refractories and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC575

1. These are two Appeals filed by M/s. Perfect Refractories and M/s.Perfect Stoneware Pipes arising out of a common

Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1989MPLJ793; [1990]76STC475(MP)

to be the business of the assessee. The Board was perfectly right in saying that even if during the course of

Perfect Pottery Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1996]221ITR210(MP)

(for short, 'the Act'), of Rs. 1,17,003 attributable to the Perfect Sanitary Pipes, Bharatpur unit. In the original assessment completed by

Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. and S.P. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(102)ECC287

the original authority imposing penalty of Rs. 3,06,574 on M/s Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. but reduced the penalty imposed on Shri

Perfect Industrial Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Offi ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(2)MPLJ632

ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order...

Perfect Electric Concern (P) L Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

name of Smt. Kuthru Kundaram and in this manner she perfected her title. The land in question has been purchased from

M/S Perfect Caps and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

has been held that Shri R. Laxman, Manager of M/s Perfect Caps and M/s Perfect Closures have actively connived in various