Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Perez V United - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

1991

Gozlon-perez Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1991

Gozlon-Perez v. United States - 498 U.S. 395 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Gozlon-Perez v. United States, 498 U.S. 395 (1991) Gozlon-Perez


Apr 26 1971

Perez Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-26-1971

Perez v. United States - 402 U.S. 146 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Perez v. United States, 402 U.S. 146 (1971) PerezPerez v. United States - 402 U.S. 146 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Perez v. United States, 402 U.S. 146 (1971) Perez v. United States No. 600 Argued March 22, 1971 Decided April 26,


Jun 06 2005

Gonzales Vs. Raich

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-06-2005

an economic “class of activities” that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce is firmly established. See, e.g., Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 , 151. If Congress decides that the “ ‘total incidence’ ” of a … Congress is authorized to engage under its commerce power. First, Congress can regulate the channels of interstate commerce. Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 , 150 (1971). Second, Congress has authority to regulate and protect the instrumentalities


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 28 2012

National Federation of Independent Business Vs. Sebelius

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2012

Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus...


Jan 09 2001

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. Vs. Army Corps of Engineers

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-09-2001

it is enough that, taken in the aggregate, the class of activities in question has such an effect. Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 (1971) (noting that it is the "class" of regulated activities, not the individual … fill for noneconomic reasons does not weaken the legitimacy of the Corps' jurisdictional claims. As we observed in Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 (1971), "[w]here the class of activities is regulated and that class is within


Jun 02 2003

Citizens Bank Vs. Alafabco, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-02-2003

Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co., 334 U. S. 219 , 236 (1948). See also Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 , 154 (1971); Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U. S. 111 , 127-128 (1942).


Jan 11 2000

United States Vs. Morrison

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-11-2000

558 (citing Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc., 452 U. S. 264 , 276-277 (1981); Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 , 150 (1971)). "First, Congress may regulate the use of the channels of … the local street corner mugger engage in "economic" activity or "noneconomic" activity when he mugs for money? See Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 (1971) (aggregating local "loan sharking" instances); United States v. Lopez, 514 U. S.


May 17 2004

Sabri Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-17-2004

§666(a)(2) is a valid exercise of Congress’ power to regulate commerce, at least under this Court’s precedent. Cf. Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 , 154 (1971). I continue to doubt that we have correctly interpreted the


Apr 26 1995

United States Vs. Lopez

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-26-1995

e. g., Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc., 452 U. S. 264 , 276-280 (1981); Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 , 155-156 (1971); Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U. S. 294 , 299-301 (1964); … Inc. v. United States, 379 U. S. 241 (1964), Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U. S. 294 (1964), and Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 (1971). These and like authorities are within the fair ambit 574 of the


Jun 19 1992

New York Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-19-1992

authorized by one of the powers delegated to Congress in Article I of the Constitution. See, e. g., Perez v. United States, 402 U. S. 146 (1971); McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316 (1819). In other cases the Court


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial