Perceptibility - Judgment Search Results

Percept Advertising Ltd. Vs. M. Ravindran, Administrator, Anubhav Plan ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2003]114CompCas652(SC); (2003)3CompLJ143(SC); 2003(2)SCALE643; (2003)10SCC84

ORDER1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The first respondent as an Administrator of a company under winding-up proceedings before the Company Judge had filed Company Application NO. 260/02 in Company Petition No. 130 of 1990...

Percept D'Markr (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC3426; 2006(2)ARBLR34(SC); 2006(2)AWC1869(SC); 2006(5)BomCR322; (2006)5CompLJ224(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ100(SC); (2006)4MLJ1695; 2006(3)SCALE324; (2006)4SCC227

the right of first refusal under Clause 31(b) of the permission agreement entered into between the appellant - Percept D. Markr (India) Pvt. Ltd. and the respondent No. 1 - Zaheer Khan is void under Section 27

Percept Live Private Limited. Vs.whitefox India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 09.2017 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 346/2017 PERCEPT LIVE PRIVATE LIMITED. versus WHITEFOX INDIA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS

Percept Talent Management Pvt. Ltd. a company registered under the Com ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(2)ALLMR72; 2008(2)ARBLR49(Bom); 2008(2)BomCR654; 2008(3)MhLj94

clause 19.During the Term of this Agreement, and in any event not later than August 16, 2007 if Percept at its sole discretion may require, the Parties shall meet to commence discussions with a view to the

Percept D'Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(1)ALLMR384; 2004(2)BomCR47; (2006)5CompLJ271(Bom)

beyond the term. For sixty (60) days thereafter, Zaheer Khan, agrees to negotiate in good faith only with percept, and not with any third party, concerning the right after the term to the use of his endorsement

Percept Picture Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shree Karma Production Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2008GLH(1)598; LC2008(1)165

D.N. Patel, J.1. Rule. Learned Counsel Mr. A.R. Majmudar waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No. 1.2. This Appeal from Order has been preferred against the order dated 24th December,2007 passed by...

Percept Advertising and anr. Vs. Secunderabad Health Care Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1998]91CompCas591(AP)

S. Dasaradha Rama Reddy J.1. The petitioner have filed this petition for winding up the respondent-company under section 439(1)(b) read with section 433(e) and 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'). The petitioners...

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.virtual Perception (Opc) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h November, 2019 ARB.P. 428/2019 PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD. VIRTUAL PERCEPTION (OPC) PVT. LTD. Through None. ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent $~A-7 * %

Zaheer Khan Vs. Percept D' Mark (India) Private Limited and Anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2004Bom362; 2004(2)ALLMR369; IV(2004)BC181; (2006)3CompLJ253(Bom)

beyond the Term. For sixty (60) days thereafter, Zaheer Khan, agrees to negotiate in good faith only with Percept, and not with any third party, concerning the right after the Term to the use of his endorsement

Prem Mohanlal Girdhani Vs. M/S. Percept Picture

Court: Mumbai

Oral Judgment: Heard finally by consent at the admission stage. 2. The Petitioner has moved this Petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (for short 'Arbitration Act'), alleging that there is an arbitration...