Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Per Stripes - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 1926

Stripe Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-11-1926

Stripe v. United States - 269 U.S. 503 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Stripe v. United States, 269 U.S. 503


Sep 26 2003

Jindal Stripe Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-26-2003

Reported in: JT2003(8)SC62; (2004)136PLR601; 2003(8)SCALE122; (2003)8SCC60; [2004]134STC303(SC)

The only case cited at the bar dealing with tax other than motor vehicles tax during the aforementioned period is the case of Kamalit Singh v. Municipal Board : AIR1987SC56 . In that case the toll tax


Jan 17 2006

Pearl Stripes P. Ltd. Vs. Secure Industries Ltd.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-17-2006

Reported in: AIR2007All561

up petition in 1999, the petitioner has never obtained a self restraining injunction so as to save the period of limitation for a suit. No suit has been filed. It is possible that as the claim was


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 04 2000

Classic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-04-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT844Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Parties Classic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.


Dec 12 2000

Classic Stripes Private Limited Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-12-2000

Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT281Tri(Mum.)bai

classification of what the manufacturer described as "printed trade advertising material". The appeal by the manufacturer M/s. Classic Stripes Pvt. Ltd., is against the demand for duty on these goods, on the ground that they are classifiable … manufacturer does nothing further with these sheets but clears them in that form to advertising company, and other persons, who may use for advertising, as we have described earlier.4. Heading 49.01, which the appellant claims, is for


Jun 20 2001

Classic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-20-2001

Matched in: Parties Classic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,


Dec 30 2004

Classic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-30-2004

Reported in: (2005)(182)ELT479Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Parties Classic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise


Jan 17 2001

Nachiketa Tubes and Stripes (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce, Chandigarh

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-17-2001

to the extent of Rs. 3,46,510/- and a penalty of equal amount was imposed on the party as per his order of adjudication. The aggrieved party appealed to the Commissioner (Appeals) and also filed with him an


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial