Per Stripes - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: per stripes Page 1 of about 8 results (0.015 seconds)Stripe Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
United States - 269 U.S. 503 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Stripe v. United States, 269 U.S. 503 (1926) Stripe v. United
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTClassic Stripes Private Limited Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT281Tri(Mum.)bai
are allowed, and the impugned order set aside.Consequential relief, if permitted by law. trade advertising material". The appeal by the manufacturer M/s. Classic Stripes Pvt. Ltd., is against the demand for duty on these
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTClassic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT844Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The duty of Rs. 75.66 lakhs approximately confirmed in the impugned order has already been deposited. The applications are...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTClassic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
1. After hearing both sides, we order that in paragraph 10 of our order, the figures "89.05" to be replaced...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTClassic Stripes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2005)(182)ELT479Tri(Mum.)bai
1. After hearing both sides and on finding that the disputed entity i.e. Danglers Advertising Material have been considered and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJindal Stripe Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: JT2003(8)SC62; (2004)136PLR601; 2003(8)SCALE122; (2003)8SCC60; [2004]134STC303(SC)
the specific purpose of providing facilities or services to the persons subjected to the tax. All State revenues are presumably expended
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPearl Stripes P. Ltd. Vs. Secure Industries Ltd.
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: AIR2007All561
obtained a self restraining injunction so as to save the period of limitation for a suit. No suit has been filed.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNachiketa Tubes and Stripes (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce, Chandigarh
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
penalty of equal amount was imposed on the party as per his order of adjudication. The aggrieved party appealed to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>