Per Se - Judgment Search Results

Puma Se & Anr vs.nikhil Thermoplast Ltd & Ors

Court: Delhi

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 992/2016 PUMA SE & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms. Astha Joshi, Advocate versus NIKHIL THERMOPLAST LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through … d August, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, unfair trade competition, delivery up, damages etc. The prayers in the

Sap Se & Ors vs.sap Edge

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 599/2015 SAP SE & ORS $~ * + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SAP EDGE Through: None versus Through: Ms. … ..... Defendants Date of Decision:22. d August, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (oral): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts, damages and delivery up etc. The prayer

Sap Se vs.newyorksys Info Solutions Private Limited & Anr

Court: Delhi

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 447/2016 SAP SE ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ranjan Narula with Ms. Astha Joshi, Advocates versus ..... Defendants NEWYORKSYS INFO SOLUTIONS PRIVATE … JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:26. h September, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (ORAL): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts of profit, damages and delivery up etc.

Sap Se & Ors vs.transweave Solutions Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Ms. Astha Joshi, Advocate ..... Plaintiffs ..... Defendants versus CS(OS) 325/2013 SAP SE & ORS $~ * + % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN TRANSWEAVE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ANR Through: … Through: None Date of Decision:12. h October, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (ORAL): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts of profit, damages and delivery up etc.

TVL.SES Engineering Builders and Civil Works Private Limited Vs The St ...

Court: Chennai

DRC-01 dated 06.12.2023, wherein the Petitioner was called upon to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. However, the Petitioner did not take advantage of the same and has thus suffered the impugned Order … thus suffered the impugned Order dated 28.07.2025.4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 ofthe respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. However, the present

Tvl SE TECHNO HUB Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Court: Chennai

GST DRC-07 with Reference No ZD331225039144S along with detailed order in GSTIN 33ADQFS3949D1ZT / 2021-22 for the tax Period APR 2021- MAR 2022 both dated 03.12.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Ms.S. Vishnupriya For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Gokulraj, … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYSE TECHNO HUB (Rep by its partner Santoshkumar Krishnappa) 6th KM Bagalur Road, Nallur Post, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu,

Dy.Y.Se Vs. Dr.i. Poornachandra Rao, Paathrudu and O

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The writ petition was also dismissed, however, by directing that the authority shall complete the enquiry within a period of four months. To know as to what exactly has happened in the incident, the Commissioner, Department of … the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) Dated:10-09-2013 Dy.Y.Sekhar..petitioner Dr.I.Poornachandra Rao, Paathrudu and others..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.B. Sesi Bushan Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.G. Vidyasagar, for R-1 GP for Services-I for RRs 2 to 7

Se Narappa and Others Vs. Holalkere Taluk Primary Co-operative Agricul ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2001KAR3802; 2001(5)KarLJ523

become vacant on the expiry of fifteen days from the date of such delivery unless within the said period of fifteen days he withdraws such resignation in writing under his hand and delivered to the Chief Executive. … On 29-7-2000 the 3rd respondent withdrew his resignation. 3. The resignation of a member is dealt with under Section 29B of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Section 29B of the

Se Se Oil Vs. Gorakhram Gokalchand

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1962)64BOMLR113

in the contract. One of the terms in the contract was that 'all other terms find conditions as per L.O.T.T.A. contract'. The letters 'L.O.T.T.A.' admittedly refer to the London Oil and Tallow Trades Association mentioned above.3. The … noticed are as follows:-By a contract made in duplicate and dated October 21, 1950, the defendants agreed to sell and the plaintiffs agreed to purchase from the defendants 100 tons of Indian Crude ground-nut oil on the

Lalit Mohan (Se-retd.) and Others Vs. Dda and Others

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

counterparts in the Central Public Works Department (CPWD). 3. Fifty four applicants who have retired or are presently serving as Superintending Engineer (SE) in Delhi Development Authority (DDA) have joined together in the present OA seeking following … should also get their pay fixed in the new scale of pay in Pay Band-4.  It would be pertinent to mention here that in the earlier pay scales The EE of CPWD as well as DDA were