Per Se - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: per se Page 1 of about 68 results (0.014 seconds)Lalit Mohan (Se-retd.) and Others Vs. Dda and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
basis’ w.e.f. 1.1.96, as per Authority’s Resolution No.166/97. 2. As per recommendations of 5th Pay Commission and as approved by the submitted their representation requesting to treat them on par with SEs in CPWD to extend the benefits of the said pay
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSe Se Oil Vs. Gorakhram Gokalchand
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1962)64BOMLR113
how the plaintiffs who were in Italy and had to perform their contract in Italy and by furnishing a letter of that in no case a decree as mentioned in the section will include an arbitration award, even if such award is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHoe Kim Seing Vs. Maung Ba Chit
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1935)37BOMLR866
which were in a deliverable state, but their Lordships, after perusing the documents containing the terms of the contracts, are unable benefit the other creditors of Po Ni by facilitating the seizure of the goods in satisfaction of their claims. The suggestion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSap Se & Ors vs.transweave Solutions Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
MANMOHAN, J (ORAL): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trademark, passing off, rendition of their evidence by way of an affidavit of Mr. Rahul Sethi (PW1).14. The plaintiffs witness has proved the aforesaid averments as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSap Se & Ors vs.sap Edge
Court: Delhi
the view that due to extensive worldwide use over substantial period of time, the plaintiffs SAP mark and SAP logo have aforesaid software programmes are computer programmes within the meaning of Section 2(ffc) of the Copyright Act 1957 and are included in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSap Se vs.newyorksys Info Solutions Private Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"injunction restraining (a) An order of Permanent the Defendant, its principal officers, directors, agents, franchisees, servants and HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 447/2016 SAP SE ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ranjan Narula with Ms. Astha Joshi,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPuma Se & Anr vs.nikhil Thermoplast Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
the view that due to extensive use over a substantial period of time, the plaintiffs PUMA mark along with the Form Directors, servants, agents and stockists, etc. are restrained from manufacturing, selling, marketing, or offering for sale or dealing in any other
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSe Narappa and Others Vs. Holalkere Taluk Primary Co-operative Agricul ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: ILR2001KAR3802; 2001(5)KarLJ523
if Acts of Parliament were drafted with divine prescience and perfect clarity. In the absence of it, when a defect appears, and 29-11-2000. 10. It is no doubt true that in Section 29B which deals with a resignation of a member reference
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDy.Y.Se Vs. Dr.i. Poornachandra Rao, Paathrudu and O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
become rampant and acute among the educated class, that too, persons in Government employment. Hardly any opportunity is left or lost, suspension. Thereafter, the matter was got enquired into by a senior officer of the department i.e.the Additional Director (Ayush).A perusal of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSes Technologies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
the benefit of exemption in terms of Notification No.23/98-Cus. as per Sl.No.188 of the Table to the Notification. The above decision dt. 22.10.07. Following the ratio of the above decisions, we set aside the impugned order by which the goods have been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>