Per Pro - Judgment Search Results

Schenck Vs. Pro-choice Network of Western N. Y.

Court: US Supreme Court

be) of making up conclusions that the trial court could permissibly have reached on questions involving assessments of fact, credibility, and "overwhelming evidence that defendants have repeatedly trespassed upon [the clinics'] property in the past and may continue to trespass in the

Kwal Pro Exports Vs. the A.C.i.T.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

the same character and nomenclature before and after the processes performed over them. Such items which were hitherto unpolished and/or rough, really the same product is not manufacture of a new product.CIT v. Lucky Mineral Pvt. Ltd. assessee was doing business of

Pro-quip Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

company) for professional services as defined in Article 15 (Independent Personal Services)." 19. Paragraph (6) of Article 12 clarifies that the thereof." In other words, if any alienation of right or property is made for consideration and such consideration is payable contingent

In Re, Pro-quip Corporation

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2002)174CTR(Del)531

12 and the facts of this case. We are not persuaded to hold that the payments made by the LPT to and out sale of property and allowing use of the property or technical know-how, In the former case property, which may

Pro Sportify Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Commissioner of Entertainment Tax, Gnctd

Court: Delhi

for admission to the shop. It may be that some persons interested more in the feature of display of fabrics by event and their role may be limited to advertising their products/ services.4. FDCIs events styled as fashion shows, were sought to

Brown Vs. Pro Football, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

the employers' claim of exemption from the antitrust laws; it permitted the case to reach the jury; and it subsequently entered collective bargaining, professional sports is "special." We can understand how professional sports may be special in terms of, say, interest, excitement,

Pro Commissioner of Income-Tax-2 vs.m/s Chrys Capital Investment Advis ...

Court: Delhi

versus ........ Appellant CHRYSCAPITAL LTD. .. ... Respondent + ITA3492018 PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ....... Appellant versus MIS CHRYS

Pro Minerals Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Or ...

Court: Kolkata

findings returned by the committee has been demonstrated to be perverse. In such circumstances, I find no merit in the present the letter. The impugned order proceeds to note that two promoters/directors had resigned their offices although they admit to control the

M/s. Pro Knits Vs. The Board Of Directors Of Canara Bank

Court: Supreme Court of India

existing regulatory guidelines on Income Recognition, Asset Classification and provisioning pertaining to Advances issued to banks by RBI, the guidelines on incumbent on the part of the concerned MSME also to produce authenticated and verifiable doucments/material for substantiating its claim of being

Pro Agro Seed Co. Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)(77)LC340Tri(Mum.)bai

find whether any notice was issued to the appellants to produce these documents on the basis of which refund claim was