Per Pro - Judgment Search Results

M/s. Pro Knits Vs. The Board Of Directors Of Canara Bank

Court: Supreme Court of India

provisions contained in the SARFAESI Act override the provisions of the other Acts including the MSME Act as per Section 35 of the said Act. In the instant cases, the concerned appellants had not applied to the … COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO …. OF2024(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.7898 OF2024 M/S. PRO KNITS .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CANARA BANK & ORS. ....RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO ….

Pro Minerals Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Or ...

Court: Kolkata

ORDER SHEET WP No.170 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PRO MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date … order was passed. A written representation made on behalf of the petitioner was not considered in its correct perspective. The findings arrived at by the Identification Committee cannot be sustained. Learned senior advocate appearing for the bank

Pro Sportify Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Commissioner of Entertainment Tax, Gnctd

Court: Delhi

(2001) 4 SCC60 where it was held that incidence of tax is on entertainment and consequently on the person availing such entertainment. In the absence of a rational nexus between the payment made for admission by a … + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 &

Pro Commissioner of Income-Tax-2 vs.m/s Chrys Capital Investment Advis ...

Court: Delhi

16.4.2018 + ITA3462018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus ........ Appellant CHRYSCAPITAL LTD. ….. ... Respondent + ITA3492018 PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ....... Appellant versus MIS CHRYS CAPITAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... RESPONDENTPresent

Pro Agro Seeds Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

other items. It has been stated that the petitioner company had been assessed to sales tax @ 4 percent on the sale of maize seeds for the period 1997-98 to 2001-02. The further case of the petitioner … of maize seeds for the period 1997-98 to 2001-02. The further case of the petitioner is that a proceeding under Section 19 of the Act was initiated against it on the basis of a judgment of the

Pro Agro Seeds Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

dated February 21, 2002, contained in annexure 1 series, asking the petitioner to pay sales tax at 9 per cent on the maize seeds. The amount demanded on making calculation on the said basis has been mentioned … Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Gurgaon and which deals in selling maize seeds and other products on wholesale basis in the State of Bihar and other States, has filed the present writ application for

Pro Lab a Partnership Concern and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka Rept ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2006KAR475; [2006]144STC33(Kar)

under the Sales Tax Act and the returns were verified and assessment orders were passed for the said period. The petitioners refer to Rainbow Colour Lab's case and sought for rectification of the assessment order and sought … the Karnataka Sales Tax Act (for short 'the Act'). The Petitioners operate photographic studios and are engaged in providing service to customers for processing and supplying photographs, photo prints and photo negatives. The petitioners submit that Section

Pro Interactive Service (India) Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 166(2009)DLT117

High Court or the Supreme Court the employer shall be liable to pay to the workman during the period of pendency of such proceedings in the High Court or the Supreme Court the full wages or the … any case the Labour Court by its award directs reinstatement of any workman and the employer prefers any proceeding against such award in the High Court or the Supreme Court the employer shall be liable to pay

In Re, Pro-quip Corporation

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2002)174CTR(Del)531

the refund of the tax, deducted by Linde Process Technologies India Ltd. calculated at the rate of 15 per cent on the part of the total remittance of US 8 2,59,875 together with interest on delayed payment … RulingSuhas C. Sen, J.The following two questions have been raised by the applicant Pro-Quip Corporation USA for advance ruling :'1. Whether the applicant is liable to tax on the amount received from

Pro Musicals Represented by Its Proprietor, SudhIn Mark Prabhakar Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(124)ECC169; 2008(150)LC169(Madras); 2008(227)ELT182(Mad)

the Customs Act 1962, is sought for by the petitioner.2. The affidavit in support of the petition is perused. The Court heard the learned Counsel on either side.3. The case of the petitioner in short is that … petitioner in short is that they are engaged in the import and trading of Digital Audio and music production equipments. They imported the musical equipments through the Chennai Airport and had cleared it for home consumption after