People V Wells - Judgment Search Results

Prado Navarette Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

that commonsense approach, we can appropriately recognize certain driving behaviors as sound indicia of drunk driving. See, e.g., People v. Wells, 38 Cal. 4th 1078, 1081, 136 P. 3d 810, 811 (2006) (“ ‘weaving all over the roadway’ ”); … tip regarding a possibly intoxicated highway driver” provides without more the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a stop. People v. Wells, 38 Cal. 4th l078, 1082, 136 P. 3d 810, 812, (2006). See also, e.g., United States v. Wheat,

Brown Vs. Allen

Court: US Supreme Court

affirmed by the Supreme Court of California in an opinion which gave extended consideration to the appellant's contentions. People v. Wells, 33 Cal.2d 330, 202 P.2d 53. This Court denied certiorari, Wells v. California, 338 U.S. 836. Wells, without

Berger Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

States, supra; Cook v. Commonwealth, 86 Ky. 663, 665-667, 7 S.W. 155; Gale v. People, 26 Mich. 157; People v. Wells, 100 Cal. 459, 34 P. 1078. The case last cited is especially apposite. Judgment reversed. * [The defendant

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)2MLJ703

been taken from Orissa is stalled causing enormous loss not only to the Board, but also to the people as well as to the consumers.5. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as … ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. The writ petitioner is the owner of the vacant landed property to an extent of 1.80 acres comprised in Survey No. 5/2 at No. 117, Pandur Village, … made and the same was also published in the local newspapers as well as in Government Gazette and objections were called for and the petitioner,

Gundila Manjappa Shetty Vs. Manjakke Shedthi and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1961Kant268; AIR1961Mys268; ILR1961KAR67

adjoining proprietor may afford ground for action; but, having regard to the judgment of the Exchequer Chamber in People-well v. Hodkinson, (1869) 4 Ex 248, and for the reasons which I have given, I am of opinion … observations of Lord Alverstone, C. J. in it.19. The defendants in that case were the owners of a well and of a pumping station situate at a short distance from a natural stream. No access for water

Pattali Makkal Katchi Vs. A. Mayilerumperumal

Court: Supreme Court of India

| Pa ge 48. Mr. Vaidyanathan relied upon a judgment of this Court in State of Kerala v. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties31 as well as judgments of the High Court of Bombay in Dattatray Yedu Thombre … November, 1970, recommending reservation of 33 per cent of posts under the State Government for Backward Classes as well as of seats in professional and educational institutions. After considering the recommendations of the said Commission, the State

C.a.Abdul Hakeem vs Sri.D.Saju

Court: Kerala

Junction is low lying area and there is severe water logging in the said places. Majority of the people living there belong to lower strata of the society and their lives became miserable during rainy season. True … No.223/2014 4the said flat situates in the property of the petitioner itself and the same was a joint venture and he has tactfully suppressed this fact from this Hon'ble Court. The averment that eastern end of the … Edappally thodu will set at rest the grievance of the petitioner as well as the local people.5. In reply to the averments in remainingparagraphs it

Bashir Ahmad Dar and anr. Vs. State and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

or equitable justification for the employees to proceed on strike and go on extending it. Rights of the people as a whole cannot be subservient to the claim, even if genuine, of an individual or only a … 1. We have considered the matter.2. Reports as directed vide order dated 12.4.2010 have been submitted. We have perused these reports.3. On going through the pleadings and on … or only a section of the people.5. Law in this regard is well settled now by the Apex Court in its various judgments. In T.K.

Devi Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1977WLN697

rests upon the right of the State to care for the health, morals and well fare of the people. In Sheoshankar v. State Government of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. AIR 1951 Nagpur 58 Hidayatullah J. as he … the State and on such date as the State Government may from time to time notify. It is well settled that a Legislature may delegate the power to determine the conditions or contingencies under which a statue

In Re: Tarit Kanti Biswas, Printer and Publisher of the amrita Bazar P ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 45Ind.Cas.338

in any way, to interfere with the due administration of justice. As Elliott, J., well puts it in People v. Stapltton (1893) 18 Colorade 568 : 23 L.R. A, 787 : 33 Pacific 167, it would be as … impossible for a litigant to get a Bench constituted according to his own choice. It is, however, a well-known method of spreading a libel for the publisher, who does not wish to take responsibility for it, to