Pension - Judgment Search Results

Southern Railway Pensioner's Association and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Pension and Pensioner's Welfare.

All Manipur Pensioners' Association and Anr. Vs. State of Manipur and ...

Court: Guwahati

effect from 1.1.96 by adding together: - (i) The existing pension/family pension:(ii) Dearness Relief up to CPI1510, i.e. @ 148%, 111%

State Government Pensioners Association Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(1)ALD338

to be indisputable, as it does to us that the pensioners for the purpose of pension benefits form a class, would

Bihar Pensioners Samaj Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

subject-matter of pronouncements by the highest Court of the land, Pensionary rights given to pensioners is a valuable right. It is

Pensioners' Assc., Ex-Assam Oil Officers and Ors. Vs. Union of India ( ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2004(101)FLR566]; JT2004(2)SC455; (2004)IILLJ807SC; 2004(2)SCALE559; (2004)3SCC265; 2004(2)SLJ451(SC); (2004)2UPLBEC1620

are to deduct at source any tax payable or any pension granted pursuant to the rules. Rule 13 further provided that

of Family Pension. No Rationale or Reason Has Either Been Disclosed in ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

on their son for their livelihood. The provision for family pension has been made to help such dependents. There appears to

Pratap Singh (Pensioner) Vs. Director, Subsidiary

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)(2)SLJ185CAT

hospitalization facilities as provided under these rules. The Department of Pension and Pensioners' Welfare are requested to take further necessary action

Government Pensioners' Association Vs. Sashi Prakash and Anr.

Court: Guwahati

petition and directed the respondents to pay the State Government pensioners Dearness Relief at the rate applicable to the Central Government

Central Laborers' Pension Fund Vs. Heinz

Court: US Supreme Court

Heinz - 02-891 (2004) OPINION OF THE COURT CENTRAL LABORERS' PENSION FUND V. HEINZ 541 U. S. ____ (2004) SUPREME COURT

Central States Pension Fund Vs. Central Transp.

Court: US Supreme Court

9 ] Although most of ERISA's legislative history focused on pension plans, Congress also studied the operation of other employee benefit