Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Pencil - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 29 2013

Hindustan Pencils Private Ltd. Vs. Gautam Pencil Industries

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

Matched in: Parties Hindustan Pencils Private Ltd. Vs. Gautam Pencil Industries


Jan 11 2002

Hindustan Pencils Ltd. Vs. Swami Dayal Sharma and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-11-2002

Reported in: 2002(24)PTC494(Del)

similar to the plaintiff's aforesaid registered trade marks and also from using the firm name of M/s. Hindustan PencilFactory and Natraj Pencil Industries. The plaintiff has also sought for a decree of rendition of accounts.2. Summons were


Jan 24 2005

Hindustan Pencils Limited Vs. G.T.V. Marketing

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2005

Reported in: 117(2005)DLT386

affidavit.3. Prayer made is to injunct the defendant or any person acting under it from selling mathematical instruments, pencils, erasers and other stationery goods using the trade mark NATRAJ/GTV'S NATRAJ or other device of NATRAJ or any


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 08 2006

Hindustan Pencils Ltd. Vs. Aparna Enamel Industries

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-08-2006

Reported in: 131(2006)DLT65

APSARA and the device of NATARAJ and APSARA.2. The plaintiff claims to be a well established manufacturer of pencils and other items of stationery, carrying on business since 1957. The plaintiff is a registered proprietor of various


May 29 2003

Hindustan Penciles Ltd. Vs. Dharam Pal JaIn and Sons

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2003

Reported in: 118(2005)DLT44

NATARAJ with the device of NATARAJ under No. 260466 dated 6.11.1969 claiming user since 22.2.1961 in respect of pencils, refills for propelling pens and pencils, pen sharpeners, pens, fountain pens, erasers, pins, clip and stapples included in


Oct 30 2006

Hindustan Pencils Limited Vs. J.N. Ghosh and Bros. Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2006

Reported in: LC2007(1)41; 2007(34)PTC49(Del)

effect from 22.7.1961, vide registration No. 225923, 260466, 283730, 400868 and 400869 registration is claimed in respect of pencils, sharpeners, pens, erasers, clips, staples, wire staples, stapling presses, paint brushes, adhesive material etc. under class 16 of


Dec 10 2002

Hindustan Pencils Limited Vs. Rakesh Kalra and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-10-2002

Reported in: 2003(26)PTC496(Del)

the device of Nataraj under No. 225923 as of 14.12.64 claiming user since 22.7.1961 in respect of writing pencils. (b) Trade Mark NATARAJ with the device of Nataraj under No. 260466 dated 6.11.1969 claiming user since 22.7.1961


Jan 23 1989

Hindustan Pencils (P) Ltd. Vs. India Stationery Products Co. and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-23-1989

Reported in: AIR1990Delhi19; 1989(2)ARBLR72(Delhi); 38(1989)DLT54

Nataraj with the device of Nataraj under No. 260466 dated 6.11.1969 claiming user since 22.2.196J in respect of pencils, refills for propelling pens and pencils, pen sharpeners, pens, fountainpeos, eraserspin, clips and staples included in class 16.


Sep 23 1993

Standard Pencils Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-23-1993

Reported in: 1993(68)ELT736(Mad)

miscellaneous petitions were heard. The petitioners are engaged in the manufacture of cosmetics and toilet preparations like 'eye-brow pencils, bindhi pencils, eye shadow, eye liners as well as other types of pencils. ' On the basis of


Mar 02 1995

Standard Pencils Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Madras

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-02-1995

Reported in: 1995(2)CTC391; 1995(51)ECC105; 1995(79)ELT23(Mad); (1995)IIMLJ397

ORDERK. A. Swami, C.J. 1. Writ Appeals 408 of 1993 and 281 of 1994 are preferred against the order dated 24-11-1993 passed on W.M.P. 31971 of 1993 filed in W.P. 7050 of 1993, where as Writ...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial