Pear - Judgment Search Results
Peare and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-20-1956
Reported in: 1957CriLJ263
Chowdhry, J.1. This is an appeal by Pyarey (28), Sudama (25), Kandhai (26), Mindai Lal (21), Gendan Lal (35), Hori...
Firm of Peare Lal Hari Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-07-1958
Reported in: AIR1958SC664; [1959]1SCR438; [1958]9STC412(SC)
Venkatarama Aiyar, J.1. This is a petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution, and the question that is raised therein...
Pear Ali Gazi Vs. State of West Bengal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2010
a cry 'fire fire'. They rushed to the house of Pear Ali Gazi and found his son in-law Mamud Ali lying
Peare Lal Sood Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-1990
Reported in: 42(1990)DLT433; 1990(19)DRJ247; 1990RLR490
V.B. Bansal, J.(1) Peare Lal Sood was convicted under Section 61(l)(a) of the Punjab
Pearly Andrew Franz Vs. Official Assignee
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-25-1965
Reported in: [1965(11)FLR365]; (1965)IILLJ478Bom; 1965MhLJ807
ORDERK.K. Desai, J.1. As regards the second relief, the debtor's contention is that a sum of Rs. 7,062.75 stands to...
Pearly Andrew Franz Vs. Official Assignee and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-25-1965
Reported in: AIR1966Bom121; (1965)67BOMLR654; ILR1966Bom325
Chainani, C.J. (1) The appellant was formerly employed in M/s Killick Nixon and Co. Ltd. Bombay. They had established a...
Peare Lal Show Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-11-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Cal531,1961CriLJ462
Mitter, J.1. These two Rules involve a point of some importance in the administration of criminal justice. The petitioners contend...
Peare Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-20-1944
Reported in: AIR1944All168
were not guilty. The trial Magistrate accepted the assertion of Pearey Lal that he was going to Bilsanda to purchase khoya
Mt. Shayam Peare Vs. Ram Autar Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-07-1938
Reported in: AIR1939All252
Bennet, J.1. In this case the plaintiff sued to recover Rs. 1275 on the basis of a promissory note dated...
Peare Lal-kishan Prasad Vs. Diwan Singh-ganeshi Lal
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-13-1930
Reported in: AIR1930All661
Badi 12th, 1982.Name of seller... Diwan-Singh-Ganeshi Lal. Name of purchaser... Pearey Lal-Kishen Prasad.Rate... Rs. 5-9-3.5. The Meerut Veoparak Sabha appears to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »