Pay Off - Judgment Search Results

The Pay and Accounts Office Employees Joint Action Committee, Rep. by ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(3)ALT782

Mr. V. Raja Mallaiah is one of the employees of Pay and Accounts Office; as such, it cannot be denied that

Auraiya Pay Office of Imperial Bank of India Vs. Notified Area Committ ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1938All302

is a system prevalent perhaps not only in this particular Pay Office but in other branches and concerns of the Imperial

Lakshadweep Special Pay Opted Pensioners' Association (LSPPA) and Othe ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

PNPW dated 1.9.2008 of the G.O.I MPPP after fixing the pay consistent with fitment benefits in the minimum pay plus Grade

I Pay Clearing Services Private Limited Vs. Icici Bank Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

b) The respondent (ICICI Bank) is ordered and directed to pay to the claimant (I-pay) Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) as cost

Pay and Accounts Officer (Ew) Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)28ITD403(Delhi)

the salaries paid to the employees of the DDA and pay the same into the Govt. treasury as required under law.

Pay and Accounts Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)219CTR(Mad)197; [2009]316ITR197(Mad)

114 dt. 27th March, 2002, the Government accorded sanction for payment of demand raised by the IT Department under protest even

The Pay & Accounts Officer vs.aifaa & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Advs. for R-1. + Crl.M.C. 732/2013 & Crl.M.A. 2569/2013 THE PAY & ACCOUNTS OFFICER ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Narula,

Govind Pay Oxygen Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector Central Excise, Panaji ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1984)86BOMLR14; 1987(11)ECC204; 1989(20)LC404(Bombay); 1986(23)ELT394(Bom); [1982]134ITR268a(Bom)

Rules, 1944 on execution of a bond for differential duty payable on the basis of value including the cost of packing

Namdeo Dyanoba Garad Vs. Superintendent, Pay Distribution Unit and ors ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(4)ALLMR791; 2001(4)BomCR380; (2002)4BOMLR252; [2002(92)FLR186]; 2002(3)MhLj431

the affidavit in reply and has contended that the revised pay scale of Rs. 600-1030 was not payable to the petitioner

Pccare247 Solutions Pvt Ltd vs.pay Commerce India Private Limited

Court: Delhi

issued to the business/consumer. Such SALES RECORDS and REFUNDS to PAYCOMMERCE within two (2) business days from the date that the