Pay - Judgment Search Results

The Pay and Accounts Office Employees Joint Action Committee, Rep. by ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(3)ALT782

Raja Mallaiah representing himself and also the Employees of the Pay and Accounts Office of Twin cities assails the validity of

Auraiya Pay Office of Imperial Bank of India Vs. Notified Area Committ ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1938All302

the Pay Office on the amount of Rs. 6626. The Pay Office wanted a further deduction of Rs. 4116 paid as

Lakshadweep Special Pay Opted Pensioners' Association (LSPPA) and Othe ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

judgments/orders which had been decided holding that the Island Special Pay is a part of Pay for all purposes, which had

I Pay Clearing Services Private Limited Vs. Icici Bank Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

interest @18% per annum from the date of award till payment and further directed to pay an amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees

Pay and Accounts Officer (Ew) Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)28ITD403(Delhi)

Act. Section 190 provides for deduction at source and advance payment of tax. Section 191 makes a provision of direct payment

Pay and Accounts Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)219CTR(Mad)197; [2009]316ITR197(Mad)

ELT 739.12. In the present appeals, the appellant i.e., the Pay and Accounts Officer is representing the Government of Tamil Nadu.

The Pay & Accounts Officer vs.aifaa & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Advs. for R-1. + Crl.M.C. 732/2013 & Crl.M.A. 2569/2013 THE PAY & ACCOUNTS OFFICER ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Narula,

Govind Pay Oxygen Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector Central Excise, Panaji ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1984)86BOMLR14; 1987(11)ECC204; 1989(20)LC404(Bombay); 1986(23)ELT394(Bom); [1982]134ITR268a(Bom)

Rules, 1944 on execution of a bond for differential duty payable on the basis of value including the cost of packing

Namdeo Dyanoba Garad Vs. Superintendent, Pay Distribution Unit and ors ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(4)ALLMR791; 2001(4)BomCR380; (2002)4BOMLR252; [2002(92)FLR186]; 2002(3)MhLj431

four years period, he was not entitled for the revised pay scale i.e. w.e.f. 1-6-1982.4. The Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad

Pccare247 Solutions Pvt Ltd vs.pay Commerce India Private Limited

Court: Delhi

cent of the withheld payment on weekly basis and that payments which had fallen due for the period 22nd March, 2012