Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Pay - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 2022

I Pay Clearing Services Private Limited Vs. Icici Bank Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-03-2022

learned Arbitrator directed the respondent-ICICI Bank as under:- “a) The respondent (ICICI Bank) is ordered and directed to pay to the claimant (I-pay) an amount of Rs.50,00,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Crores) together with interest thereon to be calculated


Feb 26 2026

Pay 10 Services Private Limited vs Union of India Ad Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

extracted as under:“8. It is respectfully submitted that during the course of investigation and inter-agency coordination, the Petitioner's payment aggregation platform and escrow account maintained with Respondent No.3 were repeatedly flagged through NCRP alerts and cyber-fraud reports,


Jul 08 2008

Pay and Accounts Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-08-2008

Reported in: (2008)219CTR(Mad)197; [2009]316ITR197(Mad)

self assessment. While so, by G.O. Ms. No. 114 dt. 27th March, 2002, the Government accorded sanction for payment of demand raised by the IT Department under protest even while pursuing the remedy of further appeal to


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 11 2017

The Pay & Accounts Officer vs.aifaa & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-11-2017

by: Mr. Sankalp Goswami with Mr. Azhar Alam, Advs. for R-1. + Crl.M.C. 732/2013 & Crl.M.A. 2569/2013 THE PAY & ACCOUNTS OFFICER ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Adv. versus AIFAA


Dec 11 1995

The Pay and Accounts Office Employees Joint Action Committee, Rep. by ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-11-1995

Reported in: 1995(3)ALT782

ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This Writ Petition was filed by the Pay and Accounts Office Employees Joint Action Committee, Hyderabad, represented by its Chairman V. Raja Mallaiah. Mr. V. Raja


Jul 04 1983

Govind Pay Oxygen Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector Central Excise, Panaji ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-04-1983

Reported in: (1984)86BOMLR14; 1987(11)ECC204; 1989(20)LC404(Bombay); 1986(23)ELT394(Bom); [1982]134ITR268a(Bom)

Provisional Assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on execution of a bond for differential duty payable on the basis of value including the cost of packing material. It may at this stage be said


Jul 04 2012

Lakshadweep Special Pay Opted Pensioners' Association (LSPPA) and Othe ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Jul-04-2012

involved in these original applications is in respect of eligibility of the applicants to get the Island special pay reckoned as part of basic pay for calculating pension. OA No. 1065 of 2010 has been taken as


Jul 14 1988

Pay and Accounts Officer (Ew) Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-14-1988

Reported in: (1989)28ITD403(Delhi)

assessee arises out of the following factual background.2. The assessee before us is Delhi Development Authority through the Pay and Accounts Officer, Engineering Wing. The Pay and Accounts Officer was required to deduct tax from the salaries


Feb 03 1938

Auraiya Pay Office of Imperial Bank of India Vs. Notified Area Committ ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-03-1938

Reported in: AIR1938All302

to the principle of assessment of a tax imposed by the Notified Area of Auraiya on the Auraiya Pay Office of the Imperial Bank of India, and he has therefore drawn up a statement of the facts


Nov 19 2018

Pccare247 Solutions Pvt Ltd vs.pay Commerce India Private Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-19-2018

488/2016 PCCARE247 SOLUTIONS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashish Agarwal, Advocate with Ms. Shruti Gupta, Advocate. versus PAY COMMERCE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: None. Date of Decision:19. h November, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial