Pattern - Judgment Search Results

Patterns Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2005)(179)ELT408Tri(Bang.)

1. For the purpose of hearing the appeal the appellant is required to pre-deposit duty of Rs. 85,35,153/-. The duty was demanded on the ground that they have failed to produce certificate from JDGFT for having...

Kulkarni Patterns Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Vasant Baburao Ashtekar and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1992SC1097; JT1992(1)SC194; 1992(1)SCALE96; (1992)2SCC46; [1992]1SCR227

for the parties and have thoroughly gone through the record. It is important to note that M/s. Kulkarni Patterns Pvt. Ltd. (defendant N.1) was the tenant, defendant No. 2 Shri D.G. Kulkarni was the Chairman of the

OM SAKTHI PATTERN Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Court: Chennai

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP.Nos.17250 and 17253 of 2026Om Sakthi Pattern Rep. by its Proprietor Sundaramoorthy Rajasekar, Thirumulaivoyal Chennai, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Thiruverkardu

Renuka Patterns vs the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Court: Karnataka

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 4461 OF 2026 (T-RES) BETWEEN:1. RENUKA PATTERNSA REGISTERED PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT, SY NO. 30/1, RENUKA NILAYA, GROUND FLOOR, VENKATAPPA LAYOUT, JIGALA CROSS,

Pattern Tex Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(128)ELT286Tri(Mum.)bai

It is not denied that this criterion in the proviso will not apply to four of the appellants, Pattern Textiles (957/92), Sreedhar Textile (959/92), Frames (962/92) and Surat Textiles (963/92), as the value of clearance in each

Pattern Makers Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

Pattern Makers v. NLRB - 473 U.S. 95 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Pattern Makers v. NLRB, 473 U.S. 95

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Data Patterns India Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT804Tri(Chennai)

in this appeal preferred by the Revenue is whether the Data Acquisition and Control Systems manufactured by M/s.Data Patterns (I) Ltd. are classifiable under Heading 90.32 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff as confirmed by

Ftc Vs. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc. - 360 U.S. 55 (1959) U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., 360 U.S.

N.T.C. (ida Pattern) Employees Assn. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)360; 1999(3)SCALE586; (2006)3SCC603

and Financial Reconstruction by order dated 21st/28th April 1998 and which would cover 518 employees of I.D. Act. pattern working in N.T.C. and its subsidiaries should be given without prejudice to the rights and contentions of all

M/S Renuka Patterns vs the Assistant Commissioner

Court: Karnataka

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 8074 OF 2026 (T-RES) BETWEEN:1. M/S RENUKA PATTERNSA REGISTERED PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT, SY NO. 30/1, RENUKA NILAYA, GROUND FLOOR, VENKATAPPA LAYOUT, JIGALA CROSS,