Patrolling - Judgment Search Results

Om Prakash Patrol and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(74)LC497(Allahabad)

1 this writ petition is filed by several petitioners seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus against the respondents...

United States Vs. Martinez-fuerte

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a checkpoint stop and search are far less intrusive than those attending a roving patrol stop roving patrols often operate at night on seldom traveled roads and their approach may frighten ..... for the individualized probable cause to search that otherwise was necessary to sustain roving patrol searches as particularized suspicion is not necessary here the warrant function discussed in almeida .....

Rajender Kumar Vs. UOI and Others

Court: Delhi

..... and had been introduced later on highlighting that the two other team members of the patrolling party were not examined without any satisfactory explanation he submitted that the impugned order being ..... from the file containing disciplinary proceedings 35 the second undisputed fact recorded is about the patrolling party entering in the basti but ct hawa singh in his version before the police .....

1 Satpal Singh. Vs. State and Others

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

..... driver mohammad akram constable satpal singh alias tt and abdul razaq bodyguards while returning from patrolling duty naka were ambushed by anti national elements near tcp crossing in which psi ajay ..... to proceed at the same time accused sewak singh asked them to have inspection of patrolling party after dropping abdul khaliq at his residence thereafter accused sewak singh again checked the .....

United States Vs. Villamonte-marquez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... discretion be limited by independent constitutional constraints we are unwilling to let the border patrol dispense entirely with the requirement that officers must have a reasonable suspicion to justify ..... danger of arbitrariness and abuse posed by the completely discretionary nature of random roving patrol stops the marginal contribution to roadway safety possibly resulting from a system of spot .....

United States Vs. Ortiz

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a checkpoint stop and search are far less intrusive than those attending a roving patrol stop roving patrols often operate at night on seldom traveled road and their approach may frighten motorists ..... deportability upon questioning by official agents the number of deportable aliens apprehended by the border patrol which makes the great majority of apprehensions nationally has grown from 38 861 during .....

United States Vs. Brignoni-ponce

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the border area in private vehicles often assisted by professional alien smugglers the border patrol s traffic checking operations are designed to prevent this inland movement they succeed in ..... potentially unlimited interference with their use of the highways solely at the discretion of border patrol officers the only formal limitation on that discretion appears to be the administrative regulation .....

Almeida-sanchez Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... search unreasonable although at least one justice mr justice powell would uphold searches by roving patrols if authorized by an area warrant issued on less than probable cause in the traditional ..... is essential that permanent or temporary checkpoints be maintained away from the borders and roving patrols be conducted to discover and intercept illegal entrants as they filter to the established roads .....

Davis Vs. Scherer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the decision to discharge an employee clearly is discretionary appellee reasons that the highway patrol regulation deprived appellants of all discretion in determining what procedures were to be followed ..... not be disciplined the regulation appellee was ultimately fired for violating required only that patrol members receive prior approval of outside employment in order to avoid conflicts of interest .....

Smith and Others Vs. the Ministry of Defence and Others

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... no suitable counter measures had been provided iv permitted the patrol of snatch land rovers to investigate the bomb blast ..... differently equipped vehicles or a fortiori regarding the deployment on patrol on 28 february 2006 of the snatch land rovers which ..... combat immunity should be very tightly constrained around the actual patrol in question even that statement does not challenge the existence .....