- Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
- Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
- Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.
Patit - Judgment Search Results
Patit Pawan Kapat Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1213 of 2013 Palit Pawan Kapat ..... Petitioner Versus...
Patit Gope Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-24-2013
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 7080 of 2013 Patit Gope ........... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand
Patit Sarkar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2018
CRL.A. 1280/2015 Judgment reserved on:10. 05.2018 Judgment delivered on:02. 07.2018 PATIT SARKAR ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.K.Singhal, Mr.Prasana and Mr.Nishant Bhardwaj,
Patit Dhibar and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-17-1986
Reported in: 1988CriLJ747
Sudhansu Sekhar Ganguly, J.1. This revisional application is directed against the order dated 22-9-1984 passed by Shri D. Dutta Gupta,...
Patit Paban Bose Vs. the Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-26-1957
Reported in: AIR1957Cal720
Chakravartti, C.J. 1. The appellant, Patit Paban Bose, commencedhis employment under the Commissioners for the Port
Patit Paban Daw Vs. Harisadhan Nandi and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-08-1937
Reported in: AIR1938Cal182
Nos. 2/1 and 2/2 Orphangunj Market by the present appellant Patit Paban Daw. Id is really the taking possession of this
Patit Paban Ray and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-04-1924
Reported in: AIR1925Cal580,84Ind.Cas.849
1. This Rule was granted on one ground only, namely, on the ground that the trial was bad and illegal...
Kailash Debi Jaiswal Vs. Patit Paban Roy
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-05-1973
Reported in: AIR1974Cal91
Kailash Debi Jaiswal and Sm. Usha Gupta against the defendant Patit Paban Roy for a decree for recovery of possession of
Hari Mahanti and ors. Vs. Patit Shahu
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-1900
Reported in: (1900)ILR27Cal789
Rampini and Pratt, JJ.1. In this suit the plaintiffs sue to have it declared (1) that a sale under Act...
In Re: Sir Dinshaw Maneckjee Patit Bart
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-29-1926
Reported in: 102Ind.Cas.49
Amberson Marten, C.J.1. For the financial year 1925-26, the assessee Sir Dinshaw Petit has been assessed for super tax on...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›