Skip to content

Patent Right - Judgment Search Results

Jul 25 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.1292 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-25-2013

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1292 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision : July 25,


Aug 26 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.1526 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-26-2013

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1526 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision : August 26,


Jul 23 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.1502 of 2012(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-23-2013

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1502 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision : July 23,


Jan 23 2014

Schering Corporation, Patent Department K-6-1 1990 Vs. Asst. Controlle ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-23-2014

filed by the appellant for seeking the relief of granting Patent right. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the


Aug 12 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.1412 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. State of Haryana and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-12-2013

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1412 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision : August 12,


Aug 21 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No. 379 of 2013 (Oandm) Vs. Rakesh Singh and Oth ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-21-2013

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.379 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:21. 08.2013 B.K.Srivastava … 1975(3) Supreme Court Cases 535, it was held that no right to appeal lies where the Court refuses to take action


Feb 08 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No. 502 of 2012 Vs. Financial Commissioner Reven ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-08-2013

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.502 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND … he does not press the fiRs.plea, i.e., protection of their rights as bona fide purchasers but prays that as the application


Jan 24 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.1148 of 2012 Vs. Chief Canal Officer/Lau, Har ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.1148 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND … however, ignored this plea and did not consider the respondent's rights. Even otherwise, the learned Single Judge has merely remanded the


Jan 16 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.673 of 2012 Vs. Angrej Kaur and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-16-2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.673 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND … Act, to “select”. permissible area. The learned Single Judge has rightly held that a big land-owner, who selects “permissible area”. under


Jul 04 2013

Letters Patent Appeal No.634 of 2009(Oandm) Vs. State of Haryana and O ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-04-2013

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.634 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision : July 04,


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial