Patent Office - Judgment Search Results

M/S Foab Solutions Pvt Ltd. vs the Controller of Designs Patent Office ...

Court: Kerala

ANIL ERANEZHUTH NIMMY K. JOSEPH AJAI BABU JOE JOSEPH DYUTHI KURIAN PULIYELI RESPONDENTS: 1 THE CONTROLLER OF DESIGNS PATENT OFFICE, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE BUILDING CP-2, SECTOR V, SALT LAKE CITY KOLKATA, PIN - 700091 2 CONTROLLER GENERAL OF … 2JUDGMENTThe petitioner has approached this Court with a singular plea that the 1st respondent - Controller of Designs Patent Office, be directed to take up their application for cancellation of registration of Design Nos.377555-001, 377556-001, 377557-001 in Class

Anup Engineering Ltd. Vs. the Controller of Patents Office, New Delhi ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1982Guj250; (1982)2GLR14

5, 1976. Complete Specification left Oct. 3, 1977. Appropriate office for opposition proceedings (Rule 4, Patents Rules, 1972) Patent Office, Delhi Branch, 5 Claims. An apparatus for producing metal bellows out of metallic tubes comprising a die preferably … It may be significantly noticed that the appropriate office address for the opposition proceedings is only mentioned as7 'Patent Office, Delhi Branch'. In pursuance to the said advertisement, it is an admitted fact, as can be seen from

Lg Electronics, Inc a Korean Corporation Vs. the Controller of Patents ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

the Controller raises such objections. The learned counsel submitted that many such applications have been allowed by the patent office. He cited Supreme Court Manu /SC/2713/2008 to interpret the meaning of the word ‘or “12. The word ‘or

Ag. Fumapharm Vs. the Controller of Patents and Designs Patent Office ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

application filed by the appellant on the ground that a new use for a known product cannot be patentable. 2. The application for patent IN/PCT/2002/00543 filed by FUMAPHARM AG on 26/04/2002 for their investigation relating to “Fumaric … efficacy of fumaric acid derivatives in the treatment of mitochondrial diseases. The explanation was not accepted and the Office informed the appellant that the subject matter was involved in respect of the prior art US 5424332 published

The Alleppy Company Ltd., Represented by Its Director, Narayanan Venug ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

contention was that the patent was granted after the due process of examination and novelty search by the patent office and notification of the acceptance of the patent application in the Government of India Extraordinary Gazette duly done, … whereas in London, Milliken Research Corporation obtained a patent numbered 1522163 for rubber backed mats from the UK Patent Office, showing that rubber backing on mats was introduced as early as 1969 and a copy of the UK

Dr. Anoop Varghese Vs. the Controller of Patents, Patent Office, Ipr B ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Matched in: Parties Dr. Anoop Varghese Vs. the Controller of Patents, Patent Office, Ipr Building and Another

Yahoo! Inc (Formerly ‘overture Services Inc.’), a Delaware C ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

applicant or, in the case of a joint application, to the applicants jointly, with the seal of the patent office and the date on which the patent is granted shall be entered in the register. (2) On the

Schering Corporation, Patent Department K-6-1 1990 Vs. Asst. Controlle ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Matched in: Parties Schering Corporation, Patent Department K-6-1 1990 Vs. Asst. Controller of Patents and Designs Government of India, Patent Office