Patent - Judgment Search Results

Novo Nordisk Health Care Ag Verseus the Assistant Controller of Patent ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... complete specification is amended under the provisions of this act before the grant of a patent the amended specification shall be examined and investigated in like manner as the original ..... of people whose applications for benefits have been denied similarly the controller of patents who is administering the patent law has the authority vested with the power to regulate the procedure regarding .....

Carbice Corp. Vs. Patents Development Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 677 nor does the grant of a united states patent exempt the patented product from limitations imposed by state police statutes patterson ..... for damages the defendant denied both the validity of the patent and the alleged infringement the district court without passing ..... of contributory infringement the victor company sold machines embodying a patent for a combination leeds catlin were held to be .....

Patent and Trade Mark Agencies Employees Union Vs. William Frederic De ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1964Cal80

..... of blue prints purely technical viii supply of printed photostat and typed copies of patent specifications xi advertising in newspapers inviting licences for the exploitation of inventions x directly ..... the industry offering licences for the exploitation of inventions xi renewal of patents and designs xii patent searches technical 3 the services rendered by the petitioners were not dependent .....

Patent Clothing Co., Ltd. Vs. Glover

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and the court being of opinion that the second claim of reissued patent no 9 616 granted to rodmond gibbons on the 22d day of ..... of the reissue was an enlargement of the single claim of the original patent and therefore invalid or if not and it could be properly construed ..... v ortmayer ante 141 u s 419 and for that reason both patents original and reissue were void what is it that the patentee claims .....

Schering Corporation, Patent Department K-6-1 1990 Vs. Asst. Controlle ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... appellant challenging the order dated 18 06 2009 passed by the learned assistant controller of patents and designs chennai rejecting the application filed by the appellant for seeking the relief of ..... granting patent right 2 learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the impugned order was passed .....

Letters Patent Appeal No.1502 of 2012(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... 200 days in filing the appeal lpa no 1502 of 2012 o m this letters patent appeal though assails the order dated 8 2 2012 whereby the learned single judge directed ..... in the high court of punjab haryana at chandigarh letters patent appeal no 1502 of 2012 o m date of decision july 23 2013 the managing .....

Letters Patent Appeal No.1292 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

in the high court of punjab haryana at chandigarh letters patent appeal no 1292 of 2013 o m date of decision july 25 2013 state of .....

Letters Patent Appeal No.1526 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

in the high court of punjab haryana at chandigarh letters patent appeal no 1526 of 2013 o m date of decision august 26 2013 state of .....

K. Sathya Murthy Vs. the Secretary Ministry for Industry and Commerce ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2007(4)KarLJ686; 2007(4)KCCRSN260; 2007(3)AIRKarR40.

..... files an affidavit sworn to by sri mannargudy sundararaman venkataraman assistant controller of patents and designs patent office chennai2 the affidavit inter alia seeks to provide information with regard to ..... 19 4 2005 sworn to by sri mannargudy sundararaman venkataraman assistant controller of patents and designs patent office chennai2 the affidavit inter alia points out that sweeping changes have .....

The Alleppy Company Ltd., Represented by Its Director, Narayanan Venug ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... opposition within the permissible period and the matter was adjudicated before the controller of patents raising objections on the same sets of grounds including prior publication prior public ..... respondents the deponent herein contented that the subject matter of the impugned patent does not satisfy the patentability criteria and the product in issue which was manufactured by various traders .....