Party In Interest - Judgment Search Results
Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel M.v. Polaris Galaxy Vs. Ba ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-23-2022
the view that Gulf Petrochem (GP) who is the customer of the plaintiff, is the proper and necessary party in the suit. Unless the plaintiff impleads GP as a party, the suit cannot be adjudicated to render proper … CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6897-6898 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 19314-19315 OF2021 OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V. POLARIS GALAXY … Appellant (s) Versus BANQUE CANTONALE DE GENEVE … Respondent (s) JUDGMENT
Owners and Parties Interested in M.V. valipero Vs. Fernandeo Lopez and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-19-1989
Reported in: AIR1989SC2206; (1990)2CALLT1(SC); (1989)3CompLJ374(SC); JT1989(4)SC11; 1989(2)SCALE642; (1989)4SCC671; [1989]Supp1SCR187
the mistake, if any, was of the Commissioner in not taking the signatures of the witnesses and no party should be prejudiced by an act or omission of the Commissioner who was an officer of the Court. … hand, the vessel continues to be detained at the Calcutta Port even after the owners have furnished the security demanded from them by interim orders in the suit.3. Even at the risk of this description being labelled
Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel Vs Viceroy Exports India P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.04.2026CORAM :THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. Owners and Parties interested in the Vessel ‘M.V.Maersk Ganges’ Presently within the territorial waters of India, in Chennai Port Limits and … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.04.2026CORAM :THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. Owners and Parties interested in the Vessel ‘M.V.Maersk Ganges’ Presently within the territorial waters of India, in Chennai Port Limits and Rep
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Owners and Parties Interested in Motor Vessel MV Hyundai Brave Having ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-12-2026
A.Nos.766 & 768 of 2026 IN C.S.(Com.Div.) No.130 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2.These applications to condone the delay of 89 days in filing written statements of D1 and...
Owners And Parties Interested in M.V.Nereus Progress (IMO 9170913) Vs ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
which is the bareboat charterer in respect of the vessel for a period of three years.The said charter- party, under Clause 31, provides for termination and the owners are entitled to terminate the charter-party inter alia for … THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI O.S.A.(CAD)No.41 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos.6201 & 6202 of 2026Owners and parties interested in M.V. Nereus Progress (IMO 9170913) a Motor Vessel flying the Flag of St. Kitts & Nevis lying
Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M.V. dong Do and anr. Vs. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-30-1999
Reported in: (2000)1CALLT367(HC)
individual members. Property of the Company is not the property of the shareholders. A shareholder has merely an Interest in the Company arising under Its Articles of Association, measured by a sum of money for the purpose … When a company in corporated it becomes a separate Juristic entity. Its right and obligations vis-a-vis the contracting party, unless there exists a provision to the contrary, must be confined to the terms of the contract. True
Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M.V. fortune Express anr. ... Overruled
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-19-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)CHN204
mentioned in the six split bills of lading.19. The defendants have also acted in breach of the charter party agreement entered with the plaintiff No. 1 by failing and neglecting to carry on board the vessel from … equivalent, i.e. Rs. 1.30 crore. In effect and for all purposes and reasons in which the plaintiffs are interested, the ship has not yet sailed away. As practically in all admiralty claims the action in rem has
Owners and Parties Interested in S. S. malacca Maru Vs. Deutsche Dampf ...
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Jul-22-1938
Reported in: AIR1938PC263
of the "Malacca Maru" gave a long blast as a signal that he intended to pass her. The parties are not in agreement as to the exact position of the ships when the blast was given; the
C.Deepa Ratnakar vs Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel "DCI D ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-19-2024
THATTIL ITTOOP BIJISH B.TOM NEVIS CASSANDRA L CAXTON LORETTA JACOB TOMLIN VARGHESE BABY SONIA DEFENDANTS : OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL "DCI DREDGE XX",A VESSEL FLYING THE FLAG OF INDIA, TOGETHER WITH HER HULL, TACKLE, … ITTOOP BIJISH B.TOM NEVIS CASSANDRA L CAXTON LORETTA JACOB TOMLIN VARGHESE BABY SONIA DEFENDANTS : OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL "DCI DREDGE XX",A VESSEL FLYING THE FLAG OF INDIA, TOGETHER WITH HER HULL, TACKLE, ENGINES,
Peirce Leslie India Limited, vs Owners and Parties Interested in the V ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-25-2023
(SR.) VIPIN P.VARGHESE ADARSH MATHEW C.ANCHALA KEVIN MATHEW GEORGE ROWENA COLETTE DIAS MEERA ELSA GEORGERESPONDENTS: 1 OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL 'MV CORALS' (IMO 9651008), l.FLYING THE FLAG OF INDIA PRESENTLY WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL WATERS … VIPIN P.VARGHESE ADARSH MATHEW C.ANCHALA KEVIN MATHEW GEORGE ROWENA COLETTE DIAS MEERA ELSA GEORGERESPONDENTS: 1 OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL 'MV CORALS' (IMO 9651008), l.FLYING THE FLAG OF INDIA PRESENTLY WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL WATERS OF
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free