Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Partner - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 06 2013

Kapil Chopra (Partner Skn) and ors Vs. Satish Chopra (Partner Skn) and ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-06-2013

the Act) for appointment of sole Arbitrator against the illegal acts of diverting the funds, investments of the partnership firm without authority etc. by the respondent Nos.1 & 2. (b) OMP No.748/2012 filed under Section 9 of


Dec 23 2016

M/s. Ruby Textiles Processing Ltd by its Partner R. Udhaya Chandhirika ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-23-2016

Matched in: Parties M/s. Ruby Textiles Processing Ltd by its Partner R. Udhaya Chandhirika and Another Vs. S.P. Rotary Prints, a registered partnership firm Rep by its Partners and Others


Mar 24 2016

G. Baktavatchalam and Co., rep. by its Managing Partner, D. Thirunaray ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-24-2016

Matched in: Parties G. Baktavatchalam and Co., rep. by its Managing Partner, D. Thirunarayanan and Others Vs. C. Abdul Rahman and Co., rep. by its Partner, C. Nadeem Ahamad and Others


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 2023

Vasantham Silks, Guruvayoor, Kunnamkulam Rep. by Partners. 1. K. V. Kh ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-31-2023

OF 2015 ON THE FILES OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT, CHAVAKKAD.REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: (VASANTHAM SILKS, GURUVAYUR, KUNNAMKULAM REP. BY PARTNERS)1. K. V. KHADER ASEES,AGED 65 YEARS, S/O CHUNNATHU VEETTIL V C KHADER, PALUVAI AMSOM AND DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,


Dec 16 2005

Daulat Feeds Duistributors, a Registered Partnership Firm, Through Par ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-16-2005

Reported in: 2006(4)ALLMR325; 2006(2)BomCR573; (2006)108BOMLR110; 2006(2)MhLj201

Matched in: Parties Daulat Feeds Duistributors, a Registered Partnership Firm, Through Partner B.R. Patil Vs. Razvi Brothers, Through Its Partner and Shri Mubarak Babalal Razvi


Nov 18 2008

P.S. Patil, Registered Firm by Its Partners, Sattyagouda Paragouda Pat ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-18-2008

Reported in: ILR2009KAR347; 2009(5)KarLJ638:2009(1)KCCR272:2009(3)AIRKarR343:AIR2009NOC1763

ORDERA.S. Pachhapure, J.1. Petitioners had challenged the order dated 7.2.2005 in Execution Case No. 5 of 1998 rejecting the Memo of Calculation dated 29.10.2004 filed by them.2. Facts relevant for the purpose of this petition are...


May 17 2006

Jai Durga Enterprises Through Its Partner Dharmendra Singh and Vs. Sta ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-17-2006

Reported in: I(2007)BC184; 2006CriLJ3312

Matched in: Parties Jai Durga Enterprises Through Its Partner Dharmendra Singh and Vs. State of U.P. and


Jan 24 2003

V.R. Subbaraya Gounder and Sons, Partnership Firm, Rep. by Its Partner ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2003

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ536

first respondent-firm, the plaintiff filed the suit in O.S. No.16 of 2001 against the petitioner-firm (represented by its Partner V.R. Sadasivam), the first defendant, the petitioner herein, one Madhura Enterprises, the second defendant and the Inspector of


Apr 15 2009

Valarmathi Oil Industries Rep. by Its Partner, K. Srinivasan S/O. A.M. ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-15-2009

Reported in: AIR2009Mad180

herein that the cheque was issued by the second petitioner herein on behalf of the first petitioner as partner of the firm, however, the same was dishonoured by the bank, due to insufficient funds. According to the


Nov 18 2004

Southern Insecticides and Fertilizers, Rep. by Its Partner Pappu Vs. P ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-18-2004

Reported in: (2005)1MLJ162

was informed of the same before the use of the goods in its business. When one of the partners of the Plaintiff was examined as P.W.1, in his chief examination, he has stated that there was no


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial