Part Time - Judgment Search Results

S. Hareesh, Part Time Sweeper Vs. the Superintendent of Post Offices S ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

stage itself by directing the 1st respondent to consider Annexure A-6 representation of the applicant within a reasonable time, at any rate within forty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The

Madusudanan a.K vs Part Time Administrator

Court: Kerala

50 YEARS, CHEKKIYARP HOUSE, PULLUR, HARIPURAM, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, KASARGOD, PIN - 671531. BY ADVS.I.V.PRAMOD SREEMUKUND R. RESPONDENTS: 1 PART TIME ADMINISTRATOR, PULLUR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK, HARIPURAM P O, KASARAGOD, KASARGOD, PIN - 671531. 2 PULLUR SERVICE CO … of the Society had adopted a resolution as early as on 28.10.2018 for this purpose; but that the Part-time Administrator, who thereafter took charge, has frozen the entire process, thus refusing to accede to his request. He,

Karnataka State Government First Grade Colleges Part-Time Lecturers' A ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(9)SC592; 1995(5)SCALE438; 1995Supp(3)SCC631; [1995]Supp3SCR532

the rejoinder-affidavit that a sub-committee has been constituted by the State Government to consider the grievances of the part-time lecturers and the cases of all such persons would be considered by the sub-committee. The Minister in-charge also

Prasanth.P.C, Part Time Sweeper vs Kerala State Co-Operative Bank Ltd. ...

Court: Kerala

TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 18TH MAGHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 1691 OF 2023 PETITIONER: PRASANTH.P.C, PART TIME SWEEPER KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KOTTAYAM, (FORMER KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK), RESIDING AT PARECHALIL HOUSE, VELOOR, KOTTAYAM WEST

Community Services Department Part-Time Workers' Union and Anr. Vs. Mu ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 47(1992)DLT559; 1992(22)DRJ540

C.M. Nayar, J. (1) The present petition is filed on behalf of Part-time Community employees of the Community Service Department of the respondent Municipal Corporation of Delhi. The petitioner no. I … Department of the respondent Municipal Corporation of Delhi. The petitioner no. I is a registered Union of such part-time employees and petitioner no.2 is a member of the said Union. They are claiming relief on behalf of

Peruri Venkata Ramana, Part-time Vs. the Superintendent of Post

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

A.III) giving preference to EDAs in the matter of absorption/ recruitment to Group 'D' posts over full-time and part time casual labours, (ii) and to quash them as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and in violation of Articles 14 & … to Group 'D' posts as notified in No. 6-82/87-SPB-I dt. 24.2.1989 (Annexure A.II) giving preference to full-time and part-time casual Mazdoors over EDAs in the matter of absorption/recruitment to Group'D' posts.3. It is the case of the