Part - Judgment Search Results

Greater Kailash Part-ii Welfare Association and ors. Vs. Dlf Universal ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2007(7)SC260; 2007(7)SCALE712; (2007)6SCC448; 2007AIRSCW3517; AIR2007SC1938

of serious traffic problems by the residents of Greater Kailash Part -II, Alaknanda Complex, Mandakini Enclave and Chittaranjan Park on account

Ge Energy Parts Inc vs.the Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr.

Court: Delhi

5577/2018 and CM APPL. 21731/2018 (stay) + + GE ENERGY PARTS INC Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates

Deepak Maruti Parte. Vs the State of MaharashtrA. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

deceased was assaulted and lying outside the house of Smt.Yamunabai Parte near the public toilet in the same locality where deceased

Motor Spare Parts Second Hand and Iron Merchants Assocn. Vs. Executive ...

Court: Chennai

and 2 of 2009 W.P.No.7384 of 2009 ------------------- Motor Spare Parts (Second Hand) and Iron Merchants Association, rep by its President,

India Motor Parts and Accessories Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner ...

Court: Kerala

WP(C).No. 2378 of 2013 (V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- INDIA MOTOR PARTS & ACCESSORIES LIMITED, DOOR NO.32/510A, MAHAKAVI VAILOPPILLY ROAD, PALARIVATTOM PO,

Gurudeen Parte Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Gurudeen Parte versus State & Ors W.P.No.15058/2012 13/09/2012 Shri Rashid Suhal Siddiqui,

Kuldeep Singh Parte Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Kuldeep Singh Parte versus State & ORS.W.P.No.13390/2012 05/09/2012 Shri A.M.Trivedi, learned Sr.Counsel with

Dharam Singh Parte Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

dharam singh parte versus state W.P.No.19899 ”3. 12.2012: Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for

B-block [Part-ii] Residents Welfare Association, N Vs. Municipal Corpo ...

Court: Delhi

to prohibition from hawking from a residential locality, i.e. B-Block, Part-I and Part-II, Naraina Vihar, which is stated to be a

“9. Before Parting with the Judgment It Is Worthwhile to Vs. Financi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

committed serious misconduct. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and given careful thought to the facts of the case.